2005
DOI: 10.13031/2013.19181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stormwater Mitigation and Surface Temperature Reduction by Green Roofs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
60
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
60
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have focused on the evaporative cooling effect provided by a variety of green roof systems (Lazzarin et al 2005;Onmura et al 2001;Saiz et al 2006). Energy studies have also demonstrated how green roofs can act as an additional layer of insulation for the building (DeNardo et al 2005;Niachou et al 2001;Kumar and Kaushik 2005).…”
Section: Energy and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have focused on the evaporative cooling effect provided by a variety of green roof systems (Lazzarin et al 2005;Onmura et al 2001;Saiz et al 2006). Energy studies have also demonstrated how green roofs can act as an additional layer of insulation for the building (DeNardo et al 2005;Niachou et al 2001;Kumar and Kaushik 2005).…”
Section: Energy and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum temperatures in roof system S1 were reduced by 7.1掳C on average, minimum temperatures by 1.2掳C compared to pebble drain (T DRAIN ). For the newly established test systems this benefit is probably T S2 T DRAIN doi: 10.17221/17/2015-SWR slightly reduced due to sparse vegetation cover since the temperature reduction is caused by evaporation and the associated latent heat flux (Denardo et al 2005). Another explanation of the dissimilar thermal regime in the segments is associated with the soil substrates characteristics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the fact that the rainwater outflow rate is affected by many factors related to local climate, precipitation profile, and the structure of the roof itself, results of various studies differ from each other in many cases. This is the case especially when the roof retentiveness is determined; its value, according to Getter et al, can be as high as 80.8% [20], compared with 45% obtained by DeNardo et al for the same roof [21]. In research work on this subject it is essential that such circumstances will be taken into account as facility location and the related precipitation profile typical for the area, especially precipitation total distribution in time, frequency of occurrence, and intensity.…”
Section: A Review Of Studies On Rainwater Management Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%