2018
DOI: 10.36510/learnland.v11i2.957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stories, Curriculum Making, and Tension as Support for Identity Shifts: A Narrative Inquiry

Abstract: This research is nestled within Huber, Murphy, and Clandinin’s (2011) understanding of curriculum making as situated not only in schools, but also in homes and communities and at the intersections of all three. It also relies on Clandinin, Murphy, Huber, and Orr’s (2010) reconceptualization of tension as a space where educative experiences can occur. An autobiographical narrative inquiry into home, school, and community curriculum making, highlights an educator’s efforts to teach relationally while being wide-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the formation of life histories, the researcher is provided with a way to delve into the most intimate part of the people he wants to analyze. Thus, going through it together with the subject of the research, they becomes a researcher of them own life (Clandinin, 2018; Cotán, 2015; Foste, 2018; Jack-Malik, 2018), arousing greater interest, if possible, for him/her. In this way, Ford’s speech (2020) is valid when he points out that the self-analysis of the events and actions that have been developed throughout his/her career serves the researcher as the first interpretation of it.…”
Section: The Narrative Inquiry For Rebuild Of Student´s Life Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the formation of life histories, the researcher is provided with a way to delve into the most intimate part of the people he wants to analyze. Thus, going through it together with the subject of the research, they becomes a researcher of them own life (Clandinin, 2018; Cotán, 2015; Foste, 2018; Jack-Malik, 2018), arousing greater interest, if possible, for him/her. In this way, Ford’s speech (2020) is valid when he points out that the self-analysis of the events and actions that have been developed throughout his/her career serves the researcher as the first interpretation of it.…”
Section: The Narrative Inquiry For Rebuild Of Student´s Life Historymentioning
confidence: 99%