2014
DOI: 10.3178/hrl.8.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storage under the 2011 Chao Phraya River flood: An interpretation of watershed-scale storage changes at two neighboring mountainous watersheds in northern Thailand

Abstract: The present study attempted estimations of watershedscale storage changes at two mountainous watersheds in northern Thailand to understand the behaviors of watershedscale storage under the 2011 Chao Phraya River flood. For this purpose, we applied a methodology that separates an hourly hydrograph into several discharge sub-components, and formulized watershed-scale storage-discharge relationships. The results showed that (1) this methodology was applicable to sub-tropic watersheds, (2) there were five differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results show lower storage capacities in faster components and higher capacities in slower components, which is often found in bucket-type models such as the Tank model by Sugawara (1995) and is similar to the previous researches (e.g. Kobayashi and Yokoo, 2013;Yokoo et al, 2014;Chiba and Yokoo, 2015). Figure S2 shows the relationships between infiltration p i n and storage (s i n -s 0,i ) for each tank that were illustrated for estimating the magnitudes of infiltration coefficients b i .…”
Section: Identifying and Modeling Runoff Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results show lower storage capacities in faster components and higher capacities in slower components, which is often found in bucket-type models such as the Tank model by Sugawara (1995) and is similar to the previous researches (e.g. Kobayashi and Yokoo, 2013;Yokoo et al, 2014;Chiba and Yokoo, 2015). Figure S2 shows the relationships between infiltration p i n and storage (s i n -s 0,i ) for each tank that were illustrated for estimating the magnitudes of infiltration coefficients b i .…”
Section: Identifying and Modeling Runoff Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Recently, Kobayashi and Yokoo (2013) suggested a methodology to identify dominant runoff processes and their corresponding watershed-scale storage by integrating the filter separation method by Hino and Hasebe (1984) and the data-based watershed-scale storage estimation method by Kirchner (2009). Later, Yokoo et al (2014) applied the methodology for interpreting the relationship between slope failure and watershed-scale storage in Thailand. Chiba and Yokoo (2015) then improved the methodology by linearizing the relationship between runoff and storage for theoretical consistency in integrating the method by Kirchner (2009) with the filter separation method by Hino and Hasebe (1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next step we need to tackle is verifying the adequacy of watershedscale storage estimated by our methodology. Applying this methodology to heavy rainfall events that generated flood inundations or sediment disasters would be helpful for evaluating the maximum storage amount as mentioned above, which is demonstrated in Yokoo et al (2013). Another possible application would be of drought situations.…”
Section: Possible Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global extent of the damages have instigated several studies which aim to understand the nature of the 2011 Thai floods, particularly in the Chao Phraya River Basin [e.g., Kotsuki and Tanaka , ; Yokoo et al ., ]. Rakwatin et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%