2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspr.2011.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storage of green coffee in hermetic packaging injected with CO2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The coffees of group I show higher sugar contents in relation to the coffees of group II (Table 2). This result is in agreement with Ribeiro et al (2011) and Selmar et al (2008), who affirm that reduction in the sugar contents is directly related to the respiratory activity of the beans during storage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The coffees of group I show higher sugar contents in relation to the coffees of group II (Table 2). This result is in agreement with Ribeiro et al (2011) and Selmar et al (2008), who affirm that reduction in the sugar contents is directly related to the respiratory activity of the beans during storage.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…After the sixth month of storage there is a significant drop in coffee quality (RIBEIRO et al, 2011). Thus, to evaluate the immediate effects, coffee samples were analyzed after 1 month of storage and latent effects were evaluated after 7 months of storage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Verificou-se, ao final do armazenamento, que as amostras dos grãos residuais de urucum se mantiveram com níveis de 10% de teor de água, corroborando com os resultados aceitáveis estudados por Ribeiro et al (2011) para grãos de café armazenados ao longo de 4 meses.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Relative humidity has been identified as a key factor for coffee quality during the postharvest-storage [41,42] and as an agroecological variable that influences the suitability of a site for coffee production [24,43]. For example, values of RHDM between 50-60% are considered optimal, and values below 20% or above 80% as suboptimal for coffee cultivation [24].…”
Section: Relative Humiditymentioning
confidence: 99%