2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storage conditions, sample integrity, interferences, and a decision tool for investigating unusual high-sensitivity cardiac troponin results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The serum was thawed 42 days later and quickly sent for analysis, ensuring minimal interference with cTnI measurement. 15 The determined serum cTnI concentration was 0.004 ng/mL, falling within the normal range. This value aligned with preoperative cTnI levels observed in horses that successfully underwent colic surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The serum was thawed 42 days later and quickly sent for analysis, ensuring minimal interference with cTnI measurement. 15 The determined serum cTnI concentration was 0.004 ng/mL, falling within the normal range. This value aligned with preoperative cTnI levels observed in horses that successfully underwent colic surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Blood was collected in a clot activator tube, promptly centrifuged to extract serum, and stored at 4°C before being frozen at −80°C within 24 h after sampling. The serum was thawed 42 days later and quickly sent for analysis, ensuring minimal interference with cTnI measurement 15 . The determined serum cTnI concentration was 0.004 ng/mL, falling within the normal range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, duplicate testing (laboratory initiative) for the Ortho hs-cTnI assay was performed with the average result reported if the 2 results met the prespecified criteria for agreement ( Supplemental Table S1 ). 3 , 4 Samples yielding poor repeat measurements were not reported for the Ortho hs-cTnI assay, with the sample sent immediately for testing with the Abbott hs-cTnI assay. 2 , 3 Data were obtained from January 14, 2021 to February 8, 2022 from the laboratory information system on samples from ED patients that were not reported with the Ortho hs-cTnI assay due to poor reproducibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of an objective biomarker here, such as hs-cTn, is extremely valuable; albeit not all hs-cTn elevations following COVID-19 infection or immunization against the virus reflect ongoing, acute injury [ 7 ]. Macrocomplexes may be a possible culprit for some of these elevations in some patients in this setting, and outside of COVID-19, macrocomplexes and other new interferences as well as different combinations of known (pre-analytical) variables may result in discordant hs-cTn levels as highlighted in articles published in the past couple of years [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%