2022
DOI: 10.1289/ehp9341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STopTox: An in Silico Alternative to Animal Testing for Acute Systemic and Topical Toxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we developed a novel prediction model for the early assessment of chemically induced reproductive toxicity potential in humans (males and females) by using a two-tier approach combined with multiple QSARs based on molecular, cellular, and animal data. QSARs always perform well in predicting in vitro endpoints with relatively simple molecular mechanisms but present poor performance on in vivo toxicities because of the complex biological context. , The implementation of the AOP framework in this study avoided this shortcoming. , Data imbalance and small in vivo data sets were the most important issues that hindered the predictive performance of QSARs . In this study, a weight correction method for the minor class improved the predictive performance of QSAR models, but still had limitations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we developed a novel prediction model for the early assessment of chemically induced reproductive toxicity potential in humans (males and females) by using a two-tier approach combined with multiple QSARs based on molecular, cellular, and animal data. QSARs always perform well in predicting in vitro endpoints with relatively simple molecular mechanisms but present poor performance on in vivo toxicities because of the complex biological context. , The implementation of the AOP framework in this study avoided this shortcoming. , Data imbalance and small in vivo data sets were the most important issues that hindered the predictive performance of QSARs . In this study, a weight correction method for the minor class improved the predictive performance of QSAR models, but still had limitations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…61,91−96 Data imbalance and small in vivo data sets were the most important issues that hindered the predictive performance of QSARs. 97 In this study, a weight correction method for the minor class improved the predictive performance of QSAR models, but still had limitations. In the future, more data balancing techniques and in vivo datasets should be used to improve predictive performance.…”
Section: Curation Of Heterogeneous In Vitro and In Vivo Datamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The STopTox online acute toxicity prediction tool predicts the commonly known “6-pack” assays ( Table 5 and Figures S11–S13 ) that are required by various drug regulatory agencies to evaluate multiple aspects of acute toxicities in humans, using machine learning (ML) models [ 51 ]. The “6-pack” assay for acute toxicity includes acute oral, dermal and inhalation toxicity, skin and eye irritation and corrosion as well as skin sensitization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The STopTox online toxicity prediction tool was employed to predict acute toxicities of the compounds in humans. The acute toxicity prediction assessments included acute oral, dermal and inhalation toxicity, as well as skin and eye irritation and corrosion, and skin sensitization ( , accessed on 15 January 2022) [ 51 ]. The AdmetSAR online ADMET tool was employed to further predict the ADMET properties of the compounds ( , accessed on 18 December 2021) [ 80 , 81 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toxicity properties of compounds were evaluated using two software products, STopTox 29 , 30 and ProTox-II. 31 In this step, 892 molecules with a toxicity class-4/5 with a predicted LD50 (mg/kg) ranged from 2,000 to 5,000 for Class V and more than 5,000 for class VI by ProTox-II and noncardiotox by STopTox were kept.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%