1972
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.6.90
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stopping Powers of Some Solids for 30-90-MeVU238Ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
50
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
9
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comprehensive analysis of q_ ff has been reported by Brown and Moak (1972). They measured stopping cross sections for uranium ions in various solids and used this data as well as earlier results on bromine and iodine ions with energies up to ^180 MeV in solids Brown 1966, Bridwell et al 1967) to calculate q ff from Eq.(5.12).…”
Section: V5 Effective Charge and Energy Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comprehensive analysis of q_ ff has been reported by Brown and Moak (1972). They measured stopping cross sections for uranium ions in various solids and used this data as well as earlier results on bromine and iodine ions with energies up to ^180 MeV in solids Brown 1966, Bridwell et al 1967) to calculate q ff from Eq.(5.12).…”
Section: V5 Effective Charge and Energy Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bohr (1941Bohr ( , 1948 argues that a calculation of the energy loss of fission fragments requires that a certain effective charge, q eff / which characterizes the ionic charge of the fragments, must be known for all velocities during the slowing-down process. Then, in its simplest interpretation, the stopping cross section, S, of a partially stripped heavy ion is related to the stopping cross section, S , of protons at the same velocity and in the same stopping material been applied, for example, by Steigert (1960a, 1960b), Northcliffe (1960), Martin and Northcliffe (1962), Teplova et al (1962), and Bethge et al (1966) and Grant (1965), Cumming and Crespo (1967), Pierce and Blann (1968), Kalish et al (1969), and Brown and Moak (1972 (5.13). Roll and Steigert (1960a) report no significant differences in q ff for ions with Z < 10 when stopped in gaseous and solid media, but in a more careful analysis of more extensive data, Roll and Steigert (1960b) find for fluorine ions that solid stopping materials lead to distinctly higher values of q f £ than gaseous ones.…”
Section: V5 Effective Charge and Energy Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the available data on the deceleration parameters of the fragments [7][8] have some scatter. This can, in particular, lead to an error of up to 20-30% when calculating the transverse profile of the energy input in LAEL.…”
Section: Description Fission Braking In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the parameter = ( ) ≈ 1-2 [6], and the dependence on the parameters of the run fragment in the environment 0 = 0 ( 0 , , ) is determined by the empirical Bohr-Wheeler relation [8]. The energy loss of an individual FF fragment in matter relative to the average kinetic energy as the distance travels is determined by the equation:…”
Section: Description Fission Braking In the Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moak [14] where Q E is the equilibrium charge state, Z the ion's atomic number, v its velocity, α the fine structure constant, and c the speed of light.…”
Section: Iib Use Of Simplified and Conservative Charge State And Stmentioning
confidence: 99%