2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stopping at the sight of food – How gender and obesity impact on response inhibition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking a look at food-related reward sensitivity in OB and OB/BED samples, the evidence from behavioral tasks was mixed: One study asked OB versus NWC participants to rate the palatability of high- and low-caloric food pictures and found no group differences in this palatability rating [ 29 ]. Three studies assessed attentional biases for food pictures [ 30 , 31 , 32 ], using slightly different tasks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking a look at food-related reward sensitivity in OB and OB/BED samples, the evidence from behavioral tasks was mixed: One study asked OB versus NWC participants to rate the palatability of high- and low-caloric food pictures and found no group differences in this palatability rating [ 29 ]. Three studies assessed attentional biases for food pictures [ 30 , 31 , 32 ], using slightly different tasks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We identified eight studies which had a focus on food-related rash-spontaneous behavior [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], one of them investigating an adolescent group (OB/BED vs. NWC) [ 40 ]. All of these studies used classical inhibitory control tasks that were adapted using food pictures, most of them requiring a manual response (or the suppression of this response), or assessing oculomotor responses in a modified antisaccade task [ 28 , 38 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Loeber et al (109) found no significant differences between lean and obese participants in performance during a food-related Go/No-Go task. Furthermore, others did not find an effect of BMI per se on SST performance in response to food, but rather a complex interaction between BMI and impulsivity (110). …”
Section: Neurocognitive Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rewarding properties of food and increased responsivity to food cues in obesity have been widely studied (e.g., Stice et al, 2009 ; García-García et al, 2014 ; Pursey et al, 2014 ; Alonso-Alonso et al, 2015 ; Horstmann et al, 2015a ; Mathar et al, 2016 ; Mühlberg et al, 2016 ). In contrast, the differential processing of reward and punishment and reinforcement learning in a none-food context are far less understood in individuals with obesity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%