2017
DOI: 10.1111/anae.14006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stop Before You Block stickers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We were also struck that in two centres it appears to be the practice that anaesthetists should make an extra mark or use a locally approved ‘stop’ sticker (to be placed on the side of block) . The Safe Anaesthesia Liaison Group (SALG) and NHS Improvement have previously stressed that no extra marks should be made or placed on the patient other than the surgical site mark (SALG; personal correspondence).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were also struck that in two centres it appears to be the practice that anaesthetists should make an extra mark or use a locally approved ‘stop’ sticker (to be placed on the side of block) . The Safe Anaesthesia Liaison Group (SALG) and NHS Improvement have previously stressed that no extra marks should be made or placed on the patient other than the surgical site mark (SALG; personal correspondence).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several measures proposed to force the 'stop' moment, from checklists to signs on ultrasound machines [2], or the novel 'mock before you block' technique [3,4]. In this context, we write to express concern about the recent correspondence that advocates either making additional 'anaesthetic' marks [5], or placing anaesthetic labels [6] on the side to be blocked, as a means of forcing the 'stop' moment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We excluded another 337 articles after reviewing the full-text citations largely because they neither identified individual NEs nor specified an existing framework (47%), or because they were non-scholarly (eg, media releases; 30%). Thus, our analyses were based on 367 articles 3 4 7–11 18–377. A full list of these articles and the information we extracted from them are found in online supplemental tables 1 and 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%