2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jat.2005.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stone–Weierstrass theorems revisited

Abstract: We prove strengthened and unified forms of vector-valued versions of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem. This is possible by using an appropriate factorization of a topological space, instead of the traditional localizability. Our main Theorem 7 generalizes and unifies number of known results. Applications from the last section include new versions in the scalar case, as well as simultaneous approximation and interpolation under additional constraints.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If T 0 and T 1 are defined by Theorem 1 then T (y, y 2 ) can be considered as an approximation to an 'idealistic' transform P such that x = P(y). On the basis of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem [16,21], T (y, y 2 ) should seemingly provide a better associated approximation accuracy of P(y) than that of the first degree polynomial T (y) = T 0 y. Nevertheless, the constraint of the reduced ranks implies a deterioration of P(y) approximation by T (y, y 2 ) = T 0 y + T 1 y 2 .…”
Section: Case 1 Choice Of W On the Basis Of Weierstrass Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If T 0 and T 1 are defined by Theorem 1 then T (y, y 2 ) can be considered as an approximation to an 'idealistic' transform P such that x = P(y). On the basis of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem [16,21], T (y, y 2 ) should seemingly provide a better associated approximation accuracy of P(y) than that of the first degree polynomial T (y) = T 0 y. Nevertheless, the constraint of the reduced ranks implies a deterioration of P(y) approximation by T (y, y 2 ) = T 0 y + T 1 y 2 .…”
Section: Case 1 Choice Of W On the Basis Of Weierstrass Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be remarked, that, in general, spaces of random variables endowed with the topology of stochastic convergence are not locally convex spaces, so that generalizations of Stone-Weierstrass theorems for locally convex spaces (see, e.g. Timofte [11]) are not applicable in this situation.…”
Section: Stone-weierstrass Theorems For Random Functions and Random Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of fundamental papers have appeared which established significant advances in this research area. Some relevant references can be found, in particular, in [11], [5], [6], [14], [2], [10], [3], [1], [4], [13], [7], [8,9], [12].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the theory of operator approximation with any given accuracy is well elaborated (see, e.g., [11], [5], [6], [14]), [2], [10], [3], [1], [4], [13], [8], [7], [9], [12]), the theory of best constrained constructive operator approximation is still not so well developed, although this is an area of intensive recent research (see, e.g., [31][32][33][34][35][36]). Despite increasing demands from applications [17][18][19][21][22][23][25][26][27][28][30][31][32][33][34][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] this subject is hardly tractable because of intrinsic difficulties in best approximation techniques, especially when the approximating operator should have a specific structure implied by the underlying problem.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%