1997
DOI: 10.1071/pp96097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stomatal Conductance and ABA Concentration in the Xylem Sap of Barley Lines of Contrasting Genetic Origins

Abstract: We investigated the controls of ABA concentration in the xylem sap and of stomatal conductance in five barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) lines of contrasting origins (Syrian or French), genetic backgrounds and previously field-evaluated drought resistances. Controlled water deficits were applied to young plants in a series of experiments in the greenhouse with contrasting evaporative demands. There was a unique relationship between soil water status and the concentration of ABA in the xylem sap measured at the end o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the behavior of genotype Grimminge was more in line with the anisohydric species, revealing a “risk‐taking” behavior, as the Ψ l decreased to maintain high the g s as SWC decreased or VPD increased over the course of the growing season. Stomatal conductance was controlled through variations on Ψ l , like in other anisohydric species (e.g., sunflower (Tardieu, Lafarge, & Simonneau, 1996; Tardieu & Simonneau, 1998), barley (Borel, Simonneau, This, & Tardieu, 1997) and almond trees (Wartinger, Heilmeier, Hartung, & Schulze, 1990)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the behavior of genotype Grimminge was more in line with the anisohydric species, revealing a “risk‐taking” behavior, as the Ψ l decreased to maintain high the g s as SWC decreased or VPD increased over the course of the growing season. Stomatal conductance was controlled through variations on Ψ l , like in other anisohydric species (e.g., sunflower (Tardieu, Lafarge, & Simonneau, 1996; Tardieu & Simonneau, 1998), barley (Borel, Simonneau, This, & Tardieu, 1997) and almond trees (Wartinger, Heilmeier, Hartung, & Schulze, 1990)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low area of mature leaves will imply a lower water loss by transpiration, which could explain a higher leaf RWC for a given amount of water in the soil. Stomatal conductance could also play a role in RWC maintenance, but no significant differences in stomatal response to soil drying has been yet identified between lines of barley (Borel et al, 1997) or other anisohydric species (J. Wery, unpublished). In preliminary studies, 'Tadmor' proved to have a higher capacity of osmotic adjustment and higher RWC under water deficit, in comparison with 'Er/Apm ' (B. Teulat & D. Rekika, unpubHshed).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) show a wider range of leaf water potential for D. viscosa (2.5 MPa) than for S. praecox (0.7 MPa) and B. cordata (1.5 MPa) fitting a better regression of g s versus Y. This may imply that Y fluctuates as soil water availability decreases and acts as a signal to regulate stomatal conductance to avoid dehydration (Comstock and Mencuccini 1998;Hubbard et al 2001) showing probably anisohydric behaviour like that of Prunus persica, the peach (Steinberg et al 1989), Prunus dulcis the almond (Wartinger et al 1990), Glycine max, the soybean (Allen et al 1994), Helianthus annus, the sunflower (Tardieu et al 1996) and barley Hordeum vulgarae (Borel et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%