2001
DOI: 10.1078/1439-1791-00054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stomatal acclimation influences water and carbon fluxes of a beech canopy in northern Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
22
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Leaf stomata sensitivity can be affected by PPFD and leaf-to-air vapor deficit (VPD) (Kutsch et al 2001) and can be modified by acclimation to soil water status (Halldin et al 1984). However, in contrast to our results, Kutsch et al (2001) concluded that reduction in stomata aperture of beech leaves in dry air was negatively correlated with the sum of PPFD of the previous 3 weeks.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Leaf stomata sensitivity can be affected by PPFD and leaf-to-air vapor deficit (VPD) (Kutsch et al 2001) and can be modified by acclimation to soil water status (Halldin et al 1984). However, in contrast to our results, Kutsch et al (2001) concluded that reduction in stomata aperture of beech leaves in dry air was negatively correlated with the sum of PPFD of the previous 3 weeks.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Leaf stomata sensitivity can be affected by PPFD and leaf-to-air vapor deficit (VPD) (Kutsch et al 2001) and can be modified by acclimation to soil water status (Halldin et al 1984). However, in contrast to our results, Kutsch et al (2001) concluded that reduction in stomata aperture of beech leaves in dry air was negatively correlated with the sum of PPFD of the previous 3 weeks. The behavior observed for stomata closure in young leaves was not clearly observed in leaves collected in summer and autumn presumably because the thicker cuticle of older leaves would have affected total leaf conductance to a greater extent than in young leaves.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…9). Kutsch et al (2001a) showed by means of model calculations that stomatal acclimation allows the plant to optimize for high carbon gain during periods of sufficient water supply and to save water during drought. It is important to note that decreases in stomatal conductance in many plants are inter-related with decreases in photosynthetic capacity (Hall and Schulze, 1980;Schulze and Hall, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaf stomatal sensitivity and maximum conductance can be modified within periods of several days to few weeks by phenology and by acclimation to factors such as soil water status (Halldin et al, 1984). Kutsch et al (2001a) assessed the influence of this mid-term stomatal acclimation on ecosystem fluxes by calculating canopy water and carbon balances for several years under different climates. In this context it is important to consider that canopy photosynthetic capacity (F P,sat ) is strongly correlated to maximum surface conductance (G s,sat ;Schulze et al (1994)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence that stomatal closure avoids xylem embolism has been reported for contrasting tree species (Jones and Sutherland 1991;Bréda et al 1993a;Lu et al 1996). On the other hand, experimental data demonstrating that stomatal aperture is driven by solar radiation, air vapour pressure deficit, temperature and extractable soil water is also well established (Bréda et al 1993b;Kutsch et al 2001;Herbst 1995). Many studies have also reported that, as a rule, leaf position within the crown determines physiological and anatomical leaf traits (Aussenac and Ducrey 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%