2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnnfm.2017.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stokes’ third problem for Herschel–Bulkley fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that case, Figure 10 of [2] shows that the static/flowing positions computed with the two models differ. A similar conclusion is obtained in [1] when comparing the interface dynamics in an Herschel-Bulkley fluid and in an averaged model.…”
Section: Properties Of the Simplified Modelsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In that case, Figure 10 of [2] shows that the static/flowing positions computed with the two models differ. A similar conclusion is obtained in [1] when comparing the interface dynamics in an Herschel-Bulkley fluid and in an averaged model.…”
Section: Properties Of the Simplified Modelsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For a thixoviscoplastic Houška fluid, there are up to three flow regions: a fully structured core region; a partly structured but unyielded plug region; and an annular yielded region. The boundary between the plug and yielded regions moves in and out over the course of an oscillation; this behavior recalls that predicted in Stokes' third problem for a fluid with distinct static and dynamic yield stresses [26], which can be thought of as a limiting case of thixotropy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Following start-up, the yield surface moves away from the plate before returning to the plate in finite time, after which the entire material is rigid; see figure 2 (cf. Ancey & Bates 2017).…”
Section: Physical Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%