2010
DOI: 10.1890/09-0179.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter

Abstract: The mineralization of nitrogen and phosphorus from plant residues provides an important input of inorganic nutrients to the soil, which can be taken up by plants. The dynamics of nutrient mineralization or immobilization during decomposition are controlled by different biological and physical factors. Decomposers sequester carbon and nutrients from organic substrates and exchange inorganic nutrients with the environment to maintain their stoichiometric balance. Additionally, physical losses of organic compound… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

29
444
2
12

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 670 publications
(524 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
29
444
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…If driven solely by C:N ratios, then the CUE should have increased from the soil < fresh litter < pre-incubated litter. The pre-incubated litter, with a C:N ratio nearing the ratios required for microbial biomass (Cleveland and Liptzin, 2007;Manzoni et al, 2010), did have the highest CUE (lowest qCO 2 ) (Table 4). Similarly, the higher CUE of the soils with litter addition relative to the control soil may have been driven by more available N resulting from the litter addition (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If driven solely by C:N ratios, then the CUE should have increased from the soil < fresh litter < pre-incubated litter. The pre-incubated litter, with a C:N ratio nearing the ratios required for microbial biomass (Cleveland and Liptzin, 2007;Manzoni et al, 2010), did have the highest CUE (lowest qCO 2 ) (Table 4). Similarly, the higher CUE of the soils with litter addition relative to the control soil may have been driven by more available N resulting from the litter addition (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C, N, P) and the recalcitrance, or the resistance to decomposition, of the molecules comprising the litter. Decomposition is generally favored by relatively low litter C:N ratios (Cleveland and Liptzin, 2007), which presumably helps to maintain the low C:N ratio of microbial cells (Sinsabaugh et al, 2009;Manzoni et al, 2010), yet, there is increasing evidence that additional aspects of quality beyond basic stoichiometry also can play a role determining decomposition rates. Koide and Malcolm (2009) tested the role of C and N concentrations on the decomposition rate of EM fungal necromass in a litterbag study and found that initial N concentration was a good predictor of the decomposition rate of these tissues.…”
Section: Necromass Stoichiometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accumulation or release of nutrients from decomposing litter is predominantly regulated by the initial N content and the stoichiometric requirements of the microbial decomposers (Xu and Hirata 2005;Parton et al 2007;Manzoni et al 2010). N release takes place generally when the initial N content is between 0.6 and 2.8 % (Berg and Staff 1981) or the C:N ratio drops below a critical threshold of 5 to 15 (Parton et al 2007;Manzoni et al 2008).…”
Section: Effects Of N Deposition and Management Practices On Litter Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical C:P ratio, with a typical range between 200 and 480 (Gosz et al 1973;Manzoni et al 2010), varies across climatic regions and ecosystems. Tropical regions generally have a higher C:P ratio due to the compound effects of increased decomposer respiration, a high decomposer C:P ratio, and strong leaching (Manzoni et al 2010). In the current study, the litter C:P ratio was far less than 480 and showed net P release from the beginning of the decomposition experiment under all treatments.…”
Section: Effects Of N Deposition and Management Practices On Litter Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation