Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3229345.3229382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock Portfolio Prediction by Multi-Target Decision Support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the MTR methods, differently from what found out in [Silva et al 2018], ERC presented the smallest errors in 5 out 12 times, followed by MTAS (the best 4 times), DSTARS (the best 2 times) and SST (the best once). Though ERC presented the smallest aRRMSE most of times, only in the second period it was the smallest error for the dataset.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the MTR methods, differently from what found out in [Silva et al 2018], ERC presented the smallest errors in 5 out 12 times, followed by MTAS (the best 4 times), DSTARS (the best 2 times) and SST (the best once). Though ERC presented the smallest aRRMSE most of times, only in the second period it was the smallest error for the dataset.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In this sense, a regression model for a performance indicator could use information of other outcomes to yield better predictions and compose a more reliable decision support tool. This paper is an extension of the work of [Silva et al 2018], whose goal was proposing a kernel to decision support tool based on MTR to predict performance indicators of stock market, showing that this approach can generate an accurate model due to the inter-target influence in this model. This work aims at obtaining the method that would result in the best prediction performance for the given problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%