1988
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.34.7.880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock Allocation in a Two-Echelon Distribution System Or “What to Do Until Your Ship Comes In”

Abstract: In this paper, we focus on a single order cycle of a warehouse, serving N retailers where the only shipments allowed during the cycle are from the warehouse to the retailers. For a simple ship-up-to-S allocation policy, we develop both the exact cost model and a computationally tractable approximate cost model for the case of identical retailers, and demonstrate empirically the benefits of centralizing at least a portion of the total system stock.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But the issue remains as to how to set the service levels. The literature on multiechelon distribution systems (e.g., Jackson 1988, Schwarz 1989, Graves 1995 suggests that, from a system perspective, it often may be better to have low levels of internal service.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the issue remains as to how to set the service levels. The literature on multiechelon distribution systems (e.g., Jackson 1988, Schwarz 1989, Graves 1995 suggests that, from a system perspective, it often may be better to have low levels of internal service.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eppen and Schrage (1981) use the balance assumption for a distribution system with a stockless warehouse and normally distributed end customer demands. Jackson (1988) extends this work to allow storing inventory at the warehouse. Axsater (2003) reviews the literature related to the balance assumption.…”
Section: Positioning and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…One exception is in serial systems, where Clark and Scarf (1960) gave the form of the optimal policy. Others such as , Jackson (1988), andGraves (1996) propose heuristics for the periodic review case. Authors who consider continuous review (R,Q)-type policies in the multi-echelon setting include Sherbrooke (1968), Deuermeyer and Schwarz (1981), Graves (1985), Moinzadeh and Lee (1986), Lee and Moinzadeh (1987), Svoronos & Zipkin (1988), and Axsater (1993).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%