1994
DOI: 10.2307/2331111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Volatility Option Pricing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
114
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
114
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Stochastic volatility models are a natural extension of the classical Black-Scholes model that have been introduced as a way to manage the skew and smiles observed in real market data (see for example Hull and White (1987), Scott (1987), Stein and Stein (1991), Ball and Roma (1994) and Heston (1993)). The study of these models have introduced new important mathematical and practical challenges, in particular related with the option pricing problem and the callibration of the corresponding parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stochastic volatility models are a natural extension of the classical Black-Scholes model that have been introduced as a way to manage the skew and smiles observed in real market data (see for example Hull and White (1987), Scott (1987), Stein and Stein (1991), Ball and Roma (1994) and Heston (1993)). The study of these models have introduced new important mathematical and practical challenges, in particular related with the option pricing problem and the callibration of the corresponding parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these extensions, one of the most popular is to allow the volatility to be a stochastic process (see for example Hull and White (1987), Scott (1987), Stein and Stein (1991), Heston (1993) or Ball and Roma (1994), among others).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this result of S&S is no longer surprising. Ball and Roma (1994) found that the S&S misdiagnosis of stochastic volatility effects is due to using an "inappropriate" value for variance in the BS price. In context of our model, these arguments are not confirmed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%