2004
DOI: 10.1080/1350486042000231902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic volatility Gaussian Heath-Jarrow-Morton models

Abstract: This paper extends the class of deterministic volatility Heath-Jarrow-Morton models to a Markov chain stochastic volatility framework allowing for jump discontinuities and a variety of deformations of the term structure of forward rate volatilities. Analytical solutions for the dynamics of the volatility term structure are obtained. Semimartingale decompositions of the interest rates under a spot and forward martingale measures are identified. Stochastic volatility versions of the continuous time Ho-Lee and Hu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heath et al (1992) proposed a forward interest rates model, known as the Heath-Jarrow-Morton (HJM) model. The HJM framework provides extra flexibility in specifying uncertainty, which allows for differences in risk across the maturity spectrum (Valchev 2004). Therefore, we assumed an instantaneous forward rate based on the HJM framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heath et al (1992) proposed a forward interest rates model, known as the Heath-Jarrow-Morton (HJM) model. The HJM framework provides extra flexibility in specifying uncertainty, which allows for differences in risk across the maturity spectrum (Valchev 2004). Therefore, we assumed an instantaneous forward rate based on the HJM framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Valchev [105] where only Gaussian models were focused and no finite-dimensional issue was considered. In [32], the volatility was specified as function of continuous-time finite…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%