2022
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-022-01439-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic variational variable selection for high-dimensional microbiome data

Abstract: Background The rapid and accurate identification of a minimal-size core set of representative microbial species plays an important role in the clustering of microbial community data and interpretation of clustering results. However, the huge dimensionality of microbial metagenomics datasets is a major challenge for the existing methods such as Dirichlet multinomial mixture (DMM) models. In the approach of the existing methods, the computational burden of identifying a small number of representa… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with generic ones, there are options available for working in the R environment (R Core Team), such as Dirichlet Multinomial Mixtures (DMM) (Morgan, 2023) or coda4microbiome (Calle et al, 2023), in the Python environment (Python Software Foundation), such as TA B L E 6 Distinct methods for variable selection designed for microbiome data, including their main advantages and disadvantages. Source: The information for the construction of this table was taken from Dang et al (2022), Hinton and Mucha (2022), Koh and Zhao (2020), Rivera-Pinto et al (2018), Wilson et al (2021) and Wu et al (2016).…”
Section: Modelling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As with generic ones, there are options available for working in the R environment (R Core Team), such as Dirichlet Multinomial Mixtures (DMM) (Morgan, 2023) or coda4microbiome (Calle et al, 2023), in the Python environment (Python Software Foundation), such as TA B L E 6 Distinct methods for variable selection designed for microbiome data, including their main advantages and disadvantages. Source: The information for the construction of this table was taken from Dang et al (2022), Hinton and Mucha (2022), Koh and Zhao (2020), Rivera-Pinto et al (2018), Wilson et al (2021) and Wu et al (2016).…”
Section: Modelling Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Source : The information for the construction of this table was taken from Dang et al. (2022), Hinton and Mucha (2022), Koh and Zhao (2020), Rivera鈥怭into et al. (2018), Wilson et al.…”
Section: Advanced Data Analysis and Visualisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also one of the first and most popular algorithms for causal feature selection in some fields, such as gene selection, microarray data analysis, and gene expression data analysis ( Ooi and Tan, 2003 ; Blanco et al, 2004 ; Jirapech-Umpai and Aitken, 2005 ; Saeys et al, 2007 ). The powerful nature of feature decoding in the analysis of high-dimensional microbiome data has also been demonstrated ( Dang et al, 2022 ; Dang and Kishino, 2022 ). The FVS can be a powerful additional tool for neuroimaging research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, given the complex nature of metagenomic data, the current BCC and Clusternomics approaches cannot cluster communities into groups with similar compositions. In contrast, the Dirichlet multinomial mixture (DMM) [20,21] is a successful method for probabilistic modeling of microbial metagenomics data. In a previous study [21],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the Dirichlet multinomial mixture (DMM) [20,21] is a successful method for probabilistic modeling of microbial metagenomics data. In a previous study [21],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%