2000
DOI: 10.2307/253674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Upper Bounds for Present Value Functions

Abstract: In most practical cases, it is impossible to find an explicit expression for the distribution function of the present value of a sequence of cash flows that are discounted using some given stochastic return process. In this paper, we present an easy computable approximation for this distribution function. The approximation is a distribution function which is, in the sense of convex order, an upper bound for the original distribution function. M.J. Goovaerts and J. Dhaene would like to thank for the financial s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a mathematical point of view, the results for the infinite market case described in Theorem 1 and Theorem 3 are very similar to finding a best upper bound for a stop-loss premium of a sum of non-independent random variables in terms of stop-loss premia of the marginals involved, as described in Goovaerts et al (2000) and Kaas et al (2000). Early references to solutions for this problem are Meilijson & Nadas (1979) and Rüschendorf (1983).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a mathematical point of view, the results for the infinite market case described in Theorem 1 and Theorem 3 are very similar to finding a best upper bound for a stop-loss premium of a sum of non-independent random variables in terms of stop-loss premia of the marginals involved, as described in Goovaerts et al (2000) and Kaas et al (2000). Early references to solutions for this problem are Meilijson & Nadas (1979) and Rüschendorf (1983).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Taking the left hand border of this interval to be the value of the inverse cdf at p, leads to the inverse as defined in (12). Similarly, we define F −1+ X (p) as the right hand border of the interval:…”
Section: The Inverse Of a Cumulative Distribution Function Is Usuallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for U ∼ U[0, 1], see derivations in Goovaerts et al (2000). This result means that the total loss Y T in the convex order sense, comprised of the most risky joint vector of losses with given marginals, has the comonotonous joint distribution.…”
Section: Scale: Development and Accident Year Variance Model Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 16 demonstrates how the estimated risk marginp i changes across accident years, superimposed with its creditable interval. Figure 17 displays the corresponding changes in estimated variance and skewness using the variance and skewness equations in (12) and (13) respectively. The risk marginp starts at 0.895 at accident year 1 when the variance is quite high.…”
Section: Skewnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several applications of the theory have been made in risk analysis (e .g., Kriegler and Held 2004 ;Bernat et al 2004 ;Ferson and Hajagos 2004 ;EPA 2003a,b ;Ferson and Tucker 2003 ;EPA 2002 ;Regan et al 2002a,b ;Kaas et al . 2000;Goovaerts et al . 2000) .…”
Section: 2 Probability Boxes (P-boxes)mentioning
confidence: 99%