2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2013.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic time analysis of syllable-referential intervals and simplex onsets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They thus proposed that invariances characterizing the relation between syllabic organization and phonetics are dynamic as opposed to static. Gafos et al (2014) pursued further analysis of the experimental and computational result of Shaw et al (2011). In their study, the statistics of syllabic organization were expressed in equations involving estimates of continuous phonetic parameters expressing the timing of consonants and vowels: consonantal plateau durations, vowel durations, and their variances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They thus proposed that invariances characterizing the relation between syllabic organization and phonetics are dynamic as opposed to static. Gafos et al (2014) pursued further analysis of the experimental and computational result of Shaw et al (2011). In their study, the statistics of syllabic organization were expressed in equations involving estimates of continuous phonetic parameters expressing the timing of consonants and vowels: consonantal plateau durations, vowel durations, and their variances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though two different phonological syllable parses (i.e., simple and complex onset parse) are assumed to be triggered by the speakers' grammatical knowledge, we expect to find naturally-induced variation on the phonetic surface patters. As mentioned before, this type of variation can be systematically triggered by factors such as prosodic structure, segmental context, and speaker-specificity (Mücke et al, 2017;Hermes et al, 2017;Gafos et al, 2014). The challenge of flexibility and stability is important for language production and it can be found within and across languages.…”
Section: Coupling Network For Syllable Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both strategies affect temporal and spatial properties of articulatory speech movements and the related acoustic output. Thus, we always deal with surface patterns which are affected by prosodic variation, segmental effects, or speaker-specific behaviour (inter alia Mücke, Hermes & Cho, 2017;Hermes, Mücke, & Auris, 2017;Gafos, Charlow, Shaw, & Hoole, 2014). However, the mediation between the linguistic and physical control systems should imply efficient timing patterns which increase either prosodic/paradigmatic contrast or decrease the costs of the physical control system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Brunner, Geng, Sotiropoulou, and Gafos' () study of initial clusters in German yields less clear results. Nevertheless, Gafos, Charlow, Shaw, and Hoole () and Shaw and Gafos () propose a stochastic modeling approach to the relationship between phonetic parameters (speech movement data) and phonological structure that provides powerful diagnostics allowing syllabification to potentially be determined in a more reliable fashion. While articulatory studies of this type will probably not end the debate on the relevance of sonority to phonological analyses, they represent a significant addition to our arsenal of tools.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%