2014
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic simulation of regionalized ground motions using wavelet packets and cokriging analysis

Abstract: Summary Performance‐based earthquake engineering often requires ground‐motion time‐history analyses to be performed, but very often, ground motions are not recorded at the location being analyzed. The present study is among the first attempt to stochastically simulate spatially distributed ground motions over a region using wavelet packets and cokriging analysis. First, we characterize the time and frequency properties of ground motions using the wavelet packet analysis. The spatial cross‐correlations of wavel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mesh size along the Y-direction is 0.05 m. A polynomial degree of 2 is adopted for the site model. Considering the shear velocity of the site (33 m/s) and the frequency range considered in this simulation (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), the average number of points per minimum wavelength is greater than 5; this shows that the mesh size adopted in this work can be considered to be reasonable. 40 Based on the established model, the Ricker wavelet is adopted as the Dirichlet boundary condition at the bottom surface of the site model.…”
Section: Shaking Table Test Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mesh size along the Y-direction is 0.05 m. A polynomial degree of 2 is adopted for the site model. Considering the shear velocity of the site (33 m/s) and the frequency range considered in this simulation (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20), the average number of points per minimum wavelength is greater than 5; this shows that the mesh size adopted in this work can be considered to be reasonable. 40 Based on the established model, the Ricker wavelet is adopted as the Dirichlet boundary condition at the bottom surface of the site model.…”
Section: Shaking Table Test Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy and the efficiency of these nonlinear MDOF models have been systematically validated by comparing the simulation results with a number of experimental results using actual earthquake records. 13,14 It is worth noting that, to date, the THA of buildings on a regional scale contains the following 2 steps: (1) the free-field ground motion is predicted by wave propagation modeling, 15 stochastic simulation, 16,17 or by using ground motion prediction equations and (2) the THA of buildings is performed to predict the seismic damage under the predicted free-field ground motions. In this way, the site effects might be well considered, but the soil-structure interaction (SSI) and the structure-soil-structure interaction (SSSI) would be neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one special form of spectral presentation, the WPT was recently used to simulate nonstationary ground motions by Yamamoto and Baker [30]. The method has also been recently extended for simulating spatially correlated ground motions by Huang and Wang [31,32]. There are several salient features of the models: (i) Unlike the Gasparini-Vanmarcke model [19], these new stochastic models can effectively characterize both amplitude and frequency nonstationarity of ground motions.…”
Section: Stochastic Simulation Of Ground Motions Using Wavelet Packetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Yamamoto and Baker [30], 13 wavelet packet parameters have been developed to fully characterize the statistical properties of the WPS, representing total energy, time-and frequency-domain distribution and correlation of the wavelet packet coefficients as summarized in Table I. One may consult Yamamoto and Baker [30], Huang and Wang [31,32] for detailed information on the definition of wavelet packet parameters. It should be noted that some of the wavelet packet parameters are closely related to ground motion IMs.…”
Section: Stochastic Simulation Of Ground Motions Using Wavelet Packetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven analysis of recorded historical earthquake ground motions [1][2][3][4][5][6] and complex physicsbased wave propagation theories [7] show that earthquake ground motion time histories are nonstationary in both amplitude and frequency content [8]. The time-varying intensity or nonstationarity in amplitude is typically characterized by the initial built-up phase, the high-intensity phase, and the gradually decaying tail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%