“…Different BSS technologies with several initial charge possibilities and DOD values are taken into account in this work, in addition to the variation of the energy market price and electrical loads uncertainty. The results obtained show that the total operating cost of the MG can be reduced considerably when a BSS is integrated into the MG. We outlined the main findings of this study as follows: (1) the total cost per day of the BSS through the lifetime of the project decreases when the value of DOD increases; however, this may not lead to a reduction of the total operating cost because of the other factors that affect the operation, such as the charging/discharging schedule of the BSS, output power of each DG, and power imported from or exported to the main grid; (2) among the different BSS technologies, the impact of NaS batteries in the reduction of total operating cost of MG is clearer than the other BSS batteries due to their high efficiency and long life time, which resulted in a reduction in the total operating cost from $1861.57 per day (with no BSS) to $1458.8 per day, a total daily saving of 21.6%; (3) although lead acid batteries have a lower capital cost compared with the other batteries, this results in a high total operating cost due to their low efficiency and short life time; (4) the total cost saving depends substantially on the lifetime and efficiency of the battery; (5) the initial charge of the BSS affects the charging/discharging schedule of the BSS, and consequently changes the output power of each DG, and the power imported from or exported to the main grid to achieve the minimum objective function; (6) the variation of the energy market price is modeled by the stochastic optimization to obtain the actual results, and the total operating cost of the MG obtained was $1406.7, which is 3.6% lower than that achieved in the deterministic case; (7) it was also concluded that deterministic studies that ignore the uncertainty of parameters result in conservative results that usually lead to a noticeable overestimation of the costs; (8) a robust optimization technique is employed to obtain the most economic hourly operation of the studied MG and protect the MGCC decisions against high costs, in which the IGDT is used to model the risk of load uncertainty and then to provide more robustness to the MGCC decisions by utilizing the available load forecast in a method where a maximum suitable operation cost of the MG can always be guaranteed using the best results obtained in the deterministic case; (9) the performance of GAMS in all cases was better than the performance of other optimization techniques such as SOS, KHS, FS, and CS. Finally, a factor that was beyond the framework of the study, and will be included in future studies, is the techno-environmental concern to minimize the emissions of the MG along with the total operating cost, taking into account various uncertain parameters and high penetration of renewables.…”