2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.84.011924
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic phase transition operator

Abstract: In this study a Markov operator is introduced that represents the density evolution of an impulse-driven stochastic biological oscillator. The operator's stochastic kernel is constructed using the asymptotic expansion of stochastic processes instead of solving the Fokker-Planck equation. The Markov operator is shown to successfully approximate the density evolution of the biological oscillator considered. The response of the oscillator to both periodic and time-varying impulses can be analyzed using the operat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we opt for the variance of the invariant density, p Var , st ( ) ( ) f across phase, , f rather than the Lyapunov exponent, λ, or the variance of the Lyapunov exponent, for the final comparative assessment. The rationale behind this selection lies in the fact that the invariant density is a property inherent to the stochastic phase transition operator employed in equation (5) [44], and may therefore reliably characterize the asymptotic dynamics of neuronal responses to distinct stimulation paradigms. Results are compared with those obtained through the employment of the Lyapunov exponent and the variance of the Lyapunov exponent for the PD dataset.…”
Section: Application Of Stimulation Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, we opt for the variance of the invariant density, p Var , st ( ) ( ) f across phase, , f rather than the Lyapunov exponent, λ, or the variance of the Lyapunov exponent, for the final comparative assessment. The rationale behind this selection lies in the fact that the invariant density is a property inherent to the stochastic phase transition operator employed in equation (5) [44], and may therefore reliably characterize the asymptotic dynamics of neuronal responses to distinct stimulation paradigms. Results are compared with those obtained through the employment of the Lyapunov exponent and the variance of the Lyapunov exponent for the PD dataset.…”
Section: Application Of Stimulation Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building upon the hypothesis that standard and temporally alternative patterns of STN-DBS exert their local-level effect through desynchronization of subthalamic neuronal activity, in this study, we employ methods from stochastic nonlinear dynamics [39][40][41] and two microelectrode recording (MER) datasets to comparatively assess the desynchronizing effect of standard (regular at 130 Hz) versus eleven temporally alternative patterns of STN-DBS for PD and OCD, and to further determine the particular pattern characteristics correlated with a significantly stronger desynchronizing effect. In particular, on the grounds of a recently developed stochastic phase model describing an ensemble of globally coupled chaotic oscillators driven by common, independent noises, and external forcing [42] (figure 1), we evaluate, for a total of 2×96 subthalamic MERs (each dataset acquired during STN-DBS for PD and STN-DBS for OCD, respectively) the invariant density (steady-state phase distribution) [43,44], as a quantity herein reflecting the desynchronizing effect of the applied patterns of stimulation on the subthalamic neural population activity. We corroborate the robustness of this measure in discriminating desynchronization scenarios through comparisons with an alternative outcome variable, the Lyapunov exponent, and provide indications for its possible correlation with the clinical effectiveness of stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constructive role of random perturbations in phase transitions is currently being actively studied. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Noise-induced effects in nonlinear systems are often unexpected and counterintuitive. Even small noise can cause phenomena that have no analogues in deterministic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We briefly introduce some of above works in Section 3.6. Moreover, we remark that the asymptotic expansion approach is employed by Yamanobe [116], [117] in physics for analyses of the impulse-driven stochastic biological oscillator and global dynamics of a stochastic neuronal oscillator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%