2011
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2011.565520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic optimal control of state constrained systems

Abstract: In this article we consider the problem of stochastic optimal control in continuous-time and state-action space of systems with state constraints. These systems typically appear in the area of robotics, where hard obstacles constrain the state space of the robot. A common approach is to solve the problem locally using a linearquadratic Gaussian (LQG) method. We take a different approach and apply path integral control as introduced by Kappen (Kappen, H.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we require both W and R to be positive definite and bounded everywhere on Ω, but otherwise impose no restrictions on them. Contrary to the assumptions in previous work [9,10,14] and the work of Kappen [7] and Broek et al [12] they are no longer required to relate to the inverse of eachother. As formulated, the control u and the noise w enters the state equation via the same matrix G. However, the problem can easily be reformulated such that the control and noise enter via different matrices as long as they have the same column space [14].…”
Section: Problem Formulationcontrasting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we require both W and R to be positive definite and bounded everywhere on Ω, but otherwise impose no restrictions on them. Contrary to the assumptions in previous work [9,10,14] and the work of Kappen [7] and Broek et al [12] they are no longer required to relate to the inverse of eachother. As formulated, the control u and the noise w enters the state equation via the same matrix G. However, the problem can easily be reformulated such that the control and noise enter via different matrices as long as they have the same column space [14].…”
Section: Problem Formulationcontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…It is worth noting that the solutions to (12) and (16) do not depend on the magnitude of ∇Z, only its direction. Also worth noting is that (16) is satisfied if the columns of G are linearly independent, and…”
Section: Variable Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, policies will be deemed more likely if they bring about states that conform to prior preferences. In the optimal control literature, this part of expected free energy underwrites KL control ( Todorov, 2008 , van den Broek et al, 2010 ). In economics, it leads to risk sensitive policies ( Fleming & Sheu, 2002 ).…”
Section: Properties Of the Expected Free Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In certain cases, the path integral is computable numerically using Laplace approximations or Monte Carlo sampling. Different applications of path-integral stochastic optimal control have been explored, such as reinforcement learning [36], variable stiffness control (equivalent to automatic tuning of PD gains) [37] and risk sensitive control [38]. The main issue with path integrals is that for most nonlinear systems the solution is computationally demanding and can not be obtained in real-time on existing processors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%