“…Tables 3-5 show the fuel economy and component efficiency of SDP, and the proposed NDP-based EMS in driving cycles of CYC_UDDS, CYC_1015, and the composite driving cycle. We can conclude that, compared with the SDP in [6], the proposed NDP EMS improves fuel economy by about 25.9%, 6.2%, and 25.6%, respectively, under CYC_UDDS, CYC_1025, and the composite driving cycle. In the three driving cycles, the proposed NDP and SDP all keep SOC in nearly the same range.…”