2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-014-0807-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic neural field equations: a rigorous footing

Abstract: We here consider a stochastic version of the classical neural field equation that is currently actively studied in the mathematical neuroscience community. Our goal is to present a well-known rigorous probabilistic framework in which to study these equations in a way that is accessible to practitioners currently working in the area, and thus to bridge some of the cultural/scientific gaps between probability theory and mathematical biology. In this way, the paper is intended to act as a reference that collects … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, ξ will be chosen as Q-Wiener process on the Hilbert space L 2 (R). In contrast to the more direct rigorous approach recently suggested in [11], where a stochastic neural field is interpreted as SDE on a suitable weighted L 2 -space, our approach via decomposition has the advantage of providing information on the precise structure of solutions and even more, allows us to prove new stability results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, ξ will be chosen as Q-Wiener process on the Hilbert space L 2 (R). In contrast to the more direct rigorous approach recently suggested in [11], where a stochastic neural field is interpreted as SDE on a suitable weighted L 2 -space, our approach via decomposition has the advantage of providing information on the precise structure of solutions and even more, allows us to prove new stability results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the calculations in Appendix A, we may write B 0 (t) = LR(0)C 0 (t) and B k (t) = (L/2)R(2πk/L)C k (t) for k ≥ 1, where the processes C k are as stated in the proposition. For k ≥ 1 the equation (9) can then be rewritten as (7) and (8).…”
Section: Interaction Of Coupling and Noise Smoothing In The Neurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each pair of parameters (c, η), which will determine the coupling strength and the width of the noise smoothing, defined in section III B, we are able to evaluate a functional of the distribution of the process Y c,η that is maximal at that value of (c, η) for which k c,η is the dominant mode. This functional, the expected squared amplitude of the kth mode of Y c,η , can be computed in terms of the drift and diffusion coefficients, λ k , σ k , of the process a k (t) defined by (7), (8).…”
Section: Interaction Of Coupling and Noise Smoothing In The Neurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Set C m 0 (t) = t 0 c m 0 (s)ds and ϕ m 0 (t) = ct + ǫC m 0 (t). Formally identifying the highest order terms in (14) we define v m 0 to be the unique strong solution to…”
Section: Expansion With Respect To the Noise Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%