2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1707.04976
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Near-Optimal Controls for Path-Dependent Systems

Abstract: In this article, we present a general methodology for control problems driven by the Brownian motion filtration including non-Markovian and non-semimartingale state processes controlled by mutually singular measures. The main result of this paper is the development of a concrete pathwise method for characterizing and computing near-optimal controls for abstract controlled Wiener functionals. The theory does not require ad hoc functional differentiability assumptions on the value process and elipticity conditio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

4
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…s for every t ∈ [0, T ] and k ≥ 1, where we recall N k (t) is given by (2.2). We now notice that Lemma 5.2 in [34] yields…”
Section: For a Given Positive Integermentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…s for every t ∈ [0, T ] and k ≥ 1, where we recall N k (t) is given by (2.2). We now notice that Lemma 5.2 in [34] yields…”
Section: For a Given Positive Integermentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This shows sup k≥1 E[J k , J k ](T ) < ∞ and we conclude J = {J k ; k ≥ 1} is an imbedded discrete structure for Y s (B s )dg and B1 is fulfilled. Moreover, (4.8) jointly with Lemma 5.2 in [34] allow us to state that B6 holds true. Then, J(B) satisfies the assumptions of Proposition 4.1.…”
Section: For a Given Positive Integermentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let us fix 0 < β < 1 and ζ > 1. A direct application of Corollary 6.1 in [29] jointly with Assumptions I-II and Lemma 2.2 in [28] yields , σ, β). In the sequel, C is a constant which may differ from line to line.…”
Section: Examples Of Non-markovian Optimal Stopping Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…}, where we recall N k (1) is given by (2.3). By using Lemma 6.2 in [29], Assumption I, Jensen and Hölder's inequality for ζ > 2, we get (5.9)…”
Section: Examples Of Non-markovian Optimal Stopping Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%