2014
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2014.2310066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic MPC Framework for Controlling the Average Constraint Violation

Abstract: This paper considers linear discrete-time systems with additive, bounded, disturbances subject to hard control input bounds and a stochastic constraint on the amount of state-constraint violation averaged over time. The amount of violations is quantified by a loss function and the averaging can be weighted, corresponding to exponential forgetting of past violations. The freedom in the choice of the loss function makes this formulation highly flexible -for instance, probabilistic constraints or integrated chanc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect the approach is similar to constraint-tightening methods that have previously been applied in the context of stochastic MPC (e.g. [7], [8], [9]) in order to ensure recursive feasibility and constraint satisfaction in closed loop operation. However, each of these methods requires that the disturbances affecting the controlled system are bounded, and they become more conservative as the degree of conservativeness of the assumed disturbance bounds increases.…”
Section: Recursive Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this respect the approach is similar to constraint-tightening methods that have previously been applied in the context of stochastic MPC (e.g. [7], [8], [9]) in order to ensure recursive feasibility and constraint satisfaction in closed loop operation. However, each of these methods requires that the disturbances affecting the controlled system are bounded, and they become more conservative as the degree of conservativeness of the assumed disturbance bounds increases.…”
Section: Recursive Feasibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although capable of handling chance constraints, existing stochastic MPC algorithms that ensure constraint satisfaction in closed loop operation typically rely on knowledge of worst case disturbance bounds to obtain such guarantees [6]. For the algorithms proposed in [7], [8], [9] for example, which simultaneously ensure closed loop constraint satisfaction and recursive feasibility of the online MPC optimisation, the degree of conservativeness increases as the disturbance bounds become more conservative. This paper ensures both closed loop satisfaction of chance constraints and recursive feasibility but does not rely on disturbance bounds, instead requiring knowledge of only the first and second moments of the disturbance input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this simplified framework, the following S-MPCc problem can be stated. where J is defined in (16), (17), (18), subject to -the dynamics (6) , with K t =K, and…”
Section: Approximation Of S-mpc With Constant Gainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chance-constraints are P{x 2 ≥ 2} ≤ 0.1, P{u ≥ 1} ≤ 0.1, and P{−u ≥ 1} ≤ 0.1. In (16), (17), and (20) we set Q L = Q = I 2 , R = 0.01, and N = 9. In Figure 2 we compare the feasible sets obtained with the different methods presented in Section 4, with different assumptions concerning the noise (namely S-MPCc (1), S-MPCc (2), S-MPCl (1), S-MPCl (2), where (1) denotes the case of Gaussian distribution and (2) denotes the case when the distribution is unknown).…”
Section: Simulation Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The randomized, or scenario-based approach [20][21][22]: It is a very general methodology that can consider linear or nonlinear systems affected by noise with general distributions characterized by possibly unbounded and nonconvex support. (2) The probabilistic approximation approach [23][24][25][26][27][28]: It is based on the point-wise reformulation of probabilistic or expectation constraints in deterministic terms to be included in the MPC formulation. Reference [29] gave an overview of the main developments in the area of stochastic model predictive control (SMPC) in the past decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%