2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/aacdd8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic models of multi-channel particulate transport with blockage

Abstract: Particle conveying channels may be bundled together. The limited carrying capacity of the constituent channels may cause the bundle to be subject to blockages. If coupled, the blockage of one channel causes an increase in the flux entering the others, leading to a cascade of failures. Once all the channels are blocked, no additional particles may enter the system. If the blockages are of finite duration, the system reaches a steady state with an exiting flux that is reduced compared to the incoming one. We pro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The physical assumption of constant transit and deblocking times τ and τ b , respectively, is responsible for strong memory effects which prevent analytical solutions for general N from being obtained. We therefore recently introduced Markovian models [29,30], where the average transit and deblocking times are stochastic variables given by exponential distributions of intensity µ and µ * , respectively. The kinetic description of the Markovian model is given by a set of differential equations for the time evolution of the state probabilities P (i, t) with i ∈ [0 · · · N ] giving the number of particles in the channel.…”
Section: Markovian Versus Non-markovian Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The physical assumption of constant transit and deblocking times τ and τ b , respectively, is responsible for strong memory effects which prevent analytical solutions for general N from being obtained. We therefore recently introduced Markovian models [29,30], where the average transit and deblocking times are stochastic variables given by exponential distributions of intensity µ and µ * , respectively. The kinetic description of the Markovian model is given by a set of differential equations for the time evolution of the state probabilities P (i, t) with i ∈ [0 · · · N ] giving the number of particles in the channel.…”
Section: Markovian Versus Non-markovian Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same procedure can be carried out for N = 3 using Eqs. (30) and (31), but the resulting expression for µ is considerably more complex. For general N we therefore propose the following ansatz, taking a similar form as the mapping for N = 2:…”
Section: Markovian Versus Non-markovian Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As binding and unbinding events of all particles are independent from each other and thus asynchronized, finding the probability density H K,N (t) of the T K,N is a challenging open problem. Note that the above problem of impatient particles resembles some stochastic models of multi-channel particulate transport with blockage [80][81][82].…”
Section: Problem Of Impatient Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As binding and unbinding events of all particles are independent from each other and thus asynchronized, finding the probability density H K,N (t) of the T K,N is a challenging open problem. Note that the above problem of impatient particles resembles some stochastic models of multi-channel particulate transport with blockage [78][79][80] .…”
Section: Problem Of Impatient Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%