2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic modeling of multi-filament yarns: II. Random properties over the length and size effect

Abstract: The present study addresses the influence of variations in material properties along the multi-filament yarn on the overall response in the tensile test. In Part I (Chudoba, Vořechovský and Konrad, 2006), we have described the applied model and studied the influence of scatter of material characteristics varying in the cross-section with no variations along the filaments. In particular, we analyzed the influence of varying cross-sectional area, filament length and delayed activation. Inclusion of these effects… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It studies the dependence of bar strength on l ρ with several different averaging lengths, l char . When l char → 0, the problem reduces to the problem of extremes of Weibullian random fields studied previously in [24,25]. When l char → ∞, the samples of random fields are random constant functions and the averaging does not modify the samples.…”
Section: Extremes Of Moving Averages Of 1d Random Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It studies the dependence of bar strength on l ρ with several different averaging lengths, l char . When l char → 0, the problem reduces to the problem of extremes of Weibullian random fields studied previously in [24,25]. When l char → ∞, the samples of random fields are random constant functions and the averaging does not modify the samples.…”
Section: Extremes Of Moving Averages Of 1d Random Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Here it should be noted that in most cases the spatial heterogeneity at arbitrary scale (meso, micro and macro) is irrelevant for the assessment of engineering structures made from basic construction materials, such as concrete, steel or wood. However, it becomes highly relevant to currently designed composites [11], structural details such as those of anchoring technology [12] or geotechnical assessment [13]. Similarly, the implicit treatment of spatial variability is important to the reliability based code calibration [14,15], design of experiments [16] and verification of various hypotheses or limit theorems, such as fracture behaviour or size effect [17].…”
Section: Small Sample Simulations For Spatial Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The breaking strain ξ is considered to be a random variable described by its probability density function (PDF) f ξ (e) (and CDF denoted as F ξ (e)). By definition of the mean value we can write that the average response of a fiber represents the mean response of a bundle with n → ∞ [8]:…”
Section: Improved Approximation Of the Standard Deviationmentioning
confidence: 99%