2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.crme.2015.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic modeling of a class of stored energy functions for incompressible hyperelastic materials with uncertainties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This motivates the use of the stochastic version where uncertainty in the parameters can be taken rigorously into account. Taking into account uncertainties in biomechanics models is a relatively young field and little work has been done in particular for soft tissue with large deformation [37]. In a clinical environment, where safety-critical decisions must be made based on the output of such simulations, being able to propagate uncertainty efficiently through such models is of importance.…”
Section: Hyperelasticity Equation With Stochastic Materials Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This motivates the use of the stochastic version where uncertainty in the parameters can be taken rigorously into account. Taking into account uncertainties in biomechanics models is a relatively young field and little work has been done in particular for soft tissue with large deformation [37]. In a clinical environment, where safety-critical decisions must be made based on the output of such simulations, being able to propagate uncertainty efficiently through such models is of importance.…”
Section: Hyperelasticity Equation With Stochastic Materials Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, following [23][24][25][26][27], for the random nonlinear shear modulus µ(a 0 ), defined by (3.7), we set the mathematical expectations: 12) where, by the constraint (3.11), the mean value µ(a 0 ) is fixed and greater than zero, and the logarithmic constraint (3.12) implies that both µ(a 0 ) and µ(a 0 ) −1 are second-order random variables (i.e. they have finite mean and finite variance).…”
Section: (A) Calibration Of Random Field Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critically, equations (3.11) and (3.12) imply that µ(a 0 ) follows a Gamma distribution (the maximum entropy distribution) [72,73], 13) where the mean value µ(a 0 ) is obtained at step 1. For the random vector (R 1 (a 0 ), · · · , Rn(a 0 )), applying the constraints [23,25] 15) this vector follows a Dirichlet distribution [41,74], D (ξ 1 (a 0 ), · · · , ξn(a 0 )). Then, every random variable Rp(a 0 ), p = 1, · · · , n, follows a standard Beta distribution [40,41], B(ξp(a 0 ), ψp(a 0 )), with ξp(a 0 ) > 0 and ψp(a 0 ) = n q=1,q =p ξq(a 0 ) > 0 satisfying 17) and is calculated from the mean values obtained at step 1.…”
Section: (A) Calibration Of Random Field Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations