2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-15248-6_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Load Models and Footbridge Response

Abstract: Pedestrians may cause vibrations in footbridges and these vibrations may potentially be annoying. This calls for predictions of footbridge vibration levels and the paper considers a stochastic approach to modeling the action of pedestrians assuming walking parameters such as step frequency, pedestrian mass, dynamic load factor, etc. to be random variables. By this approach a probability distribution function of bridge response is calculated. The paper explores how sensitive estimates of probability distributio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the vertical component produced by a person is predominantly higher than the longitudinal and transversal components, this study has considered the vertical component (Shahabpoor et al, 2016; Casciati et al, 2017; Rezende et al, 2020). The vertical force produced by the pedestrian’s feet is usually of the same magnitude and can be approximated by a sine function (Zivanovic, 2006; Kala et al, 2009; Pedersen and Frier, 2010; Caprani and Ahmadi, 2016; Fujino and Siringoringo, 2016), which is present by equation (1)where W=mpg is the weight of the pedestrian; fp is pedestrian pacing rate (pedestrian frequency), which is a function of pedestrian velocity and stride length, fp=vlp (Pedersen and Frier, 2015); ηk represents the coefficient of Fourier series named as "dynamic load factor (DLF)"; φk is the harmonic phase angle, which can be taken uniformly random in the range of [π,π] (Racic and Pavic, 2010; Racic and Brownjohn, 2011).…”
Section: Governing Equations Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the vertical component produced by a person is predominantly higher than the longitudinal and transversal components, this study has considered the vertical component (Shahabpoor et al, 2016; Casciati et al, 2017; Rezende et al, 2020). The vertical force produced by the pedestrian’s feet is usually of the same magnitude and can be approximated by a sine function (Zivanovic, 2006; Kala et al, 2009; Pedersen and Frier, 2010; Caprani and Ahmadi, 2016; Fujino and Siringoringo, 2016), which is present by equation (1)where W=mpg is the weight of the pedestrian; fp is pedestrian pacing rate (pedestrian frequency), which is a function of pedestrian velocity and stride length, fp=vlp (Pedersen and Frier, 2015); ηk represents the coefficient of Fourier series named as "dynamic load factor (DLF)"; φk is the harmonic phase angle, which can be taken uniformly random in the range of [π,π] (Racic and Pavic, 2010; Racic and Brownjohn, 2011).…”
Section: Governing Equations Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where W ¼ m p g is the weight of the pedestrian; f p is pedestrian pacing rate (pedestrian frequency), which is a function of pedestrian velocity and stride length, f p ¼ v l p (Pedersen and Frier, 2015); η k represents the coefficient of Fourier series named as }dynamic load factor ðDLFÞ}; φ k is the harmonic phase angle, which can be taken uniformly random in the range of ½Àπ,π (Racic and Pavic, 2010;Racic and Brownjohn, 2011). For a walking pedestrian, Young (2001) proposed DLFs for the first four harmonics as a function of the walking rate assumed to be in the range from 1 to 2.8 Hz, which is shown in equation ( 2) in the present study…”
Section: Governing Equations Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%