2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00275-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic hydraulic safety factor for gas containment in underground storage caverns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The economic data for the optimization, which were fulfilled into the objective function, are presented in Table 3. The design stored gas capacity per the cavern V gas was planned to be 5.56 millions m 3 , number of planned caverns No cav was 1, the volume of tunnel excavation per cavern was 1330 m 3 , the unit mass of steel ρ was 7.85 t/m 3 and the percentage of the reinforcement r perc was 0.15%. Since the NLP model OPTUGS is highly non-linear, the optimization was performed by the computer code GAMS/CONOPT2 (the general reduced gradient method) [12].…”
Section: Optimization Of the Ugs Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The economic data for the optimization, which were fulfilled into the objective function, are presented in Table 3. The design stored gas capacity per the cavern V gas was planned to be 5.56 millions m 3 , number of planned caverns No cav was 1, the volume of tunnel excavation per cavern was 1330 m 3 , the unit mass of steel ρ was 7.85 t/m 3 and the percentage of the reinforcement r perc was 0.15%. Since the NLP model OPTUGS is highly non-linear, the optimization was performed by the computer code GAMS/CONOPT2 (the general reduced gradient method) [12].…”
Section: Optimization Of the Ugs Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper deals with the optimization of the investment and operational costs of the underground gas storage (UGS), designed from lined rock caverns (LRC) [1][2][3]. The optimization is performed by the non-linear programming (NLP) approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper deals with the optimization of the investment and operational costs of an underground gas storage (UGS), designed from lined rock caverns (LRCs) [1][2][3]. The optimization is performed by the non-linear programming (NLP) approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goodall et al (1988) proposed the simple criterion that no gas leakage can occur as long as water pressure increases for some interval along all possible gas-leakage paths away from a cavern. Recently, Chung et al (2003) pointed out that the spatial heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivities directly affects the variation of hydraulic head and gradient. Hence, a safety factor calculated assuming a homogeneous hydraulic conductivity is insufficient to ensure safety from gas leakage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the safety factor calculated by assuming homogeneous hydraulic conductivity is insufficient to ensure safety from gas leakage (Chung et al, 2003). However, the previous study is based on the hydraulic gradient calculated from a conventional saturated groundwater flow simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%