2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2019.03.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic homogenization of certain nonconvex Hamilton–Jacobi equations

Abstract: In this paper, we prove the stochastic homogenization of certain nonconvex Hamilton-Jacobi equations. The nonconvex Hamiltonians, which are generally uneven and inseparable, are generated by a sequence of quasiconvex Hamiltonians and a sequence of quasiconcave Hamiltonians through the min-max formula. We provide a monotonicity assumption on the contact values between those stably paired Hamiltonians so as to guarantee the stochastic homogenzation.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 35B27.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For other (positive and negative) results on the homogenization of HJ equations with nonconvex Hamiltonians, see [14,16,26].…”
Section: Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For other (positive and negative) results on the homogenization of HJ equations with nonconvex Hamiltonians, see [14,16,26].…”
Section: Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was proven in a series of works started by Armstrong, Tran and Yu [4,5] (for Hamiltonians in separated form) and completed by Gao [9] (general coercive Hamiltonians in d = 1). These techniques generalize to some higher dimensional problems with a special structure, see Gao [10].…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If quasiconvexity is violated, then there is no general answer to the question of homogenization. Indeed, when d ≥ 2, there are positive results for certain classes of such HJ equations (see [4,6,1,25,18]) as well as negative results for others (see [30,15,14]). The counterexamples in the latter collection of papers involve Hamiltonians with saddle points, so they cannot be adapted to d = 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%