2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30203-2_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Graph Transformation Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heckel et al propose in [17] the modeling and analysis of stochastic graphs transformation systems by defining Continuous Time Markov chains from GTSs with transition matrices representing the probabilities of the application of each rule. They provide some support using GROOVE [28] and PRISM.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heckel et al propose in [17] the modeling and analysis of stochastic graphs transformation systems by defining Continuous Time Markov chains from GTSs with transition matrices representing the probabilities of the application of each rule. They provide some support using GROOVE [28] and PRISM.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding point 1, we propose a notion of stochastic marked graph rewriting which follows the general guidelines of the theory of graph transformation systems (GTS) [16,7,15,29,6,25]. Stochastic processes are modelled as rewrite rules over directed multigraphs with marks allowing for pre-and post-conditions on node degrees.…”
Section: Our Goalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We start with preliminaries on directed multigraphs, followed by a brief summary of the DPO approach and its stochastic semantics [25]. Next, we introduce marked graphs as a means to add simple application conditions to graph rewrite rules.…”
Section: Reversible Stochastic Graph Rewritingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9], GT rules are extended with stochastic delays given by a negative exponential distribution. A rule with stochastic delay p = L τ → R has similar semantics to a delayed rule, but the difference concerns the memory policy when it is executed.…”
Section: Fig 8 Activities (Left) Rules With Delays (Center) Stochmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of [9] takes concepts from stochastic Petri nets, so that rules are assigned a delay given by a negative exponential distribution. An important difference is that, while time is assigned to rules in [4,9,17], we assign it to schedulings. Hence, while they interpret rules as activities with unobservable initiation, we interpret rules as events, making our approach able to model all of them in a unified way.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%