2018
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2016.2632309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Geometry Methods for Modeling Automotive Radar Interference

Abstract: As the use of automotive radar increases, performance limitations associated with radar-to-radar interference will become more significant. In this paper we employ tools from stochastic geometry to characterize the statistics of radar interference. Specifically, using two different models for vehicle spacial distributions, namely, a Poisson point process and a Bernoulli lattice process, we calculate for each case the interference statistics and obtain analytical expressions for the probability of successful ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
82
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(51 reference statements)
3
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 1 In order to better isolate the effect of interference, we consider a fixed RCS, representative of static targets. 2 Following stochastic geometry arguments, the impact of noise on communications links would appear as a scaling factor on throughput at very low densities, not altering the trends we report. As for radars, additional results, not shown here due to space constraints, confirm that thermal noise also becomes non-negligible only in very sparse networks, while for all densities considered in our study mutual interference is the key performance driver (see also [16]).…”
Section: B Channel and Interference Modelmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…2 1 In order to better isolate the effect of interference, we consider a fixed RCS, representative of static targets. 2 Following stochastic geometry arguments, the impact of noise on communications links would appear as a scaling factor on throughput at very low densities, not altering the trends we report. As for radars, additional results, not shown here due to space constraints, confirm that thermal noise also becomes non-negligible only in very sparse networks, while for all densities considered in our study mutual interference is the key performance driver (see also [16]).…”
Section: B Channel and Interference Modelmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Nevertheless, it is natural to assume that the strongly thinned process generates interference statistics similar to those of the thinned PPP. In other words, a PPP with intensity λ in (c, ∞) predicts more accurately the interference field due to the process Φ c of equal intensity for smaller ξ [21], e.g., compare the accuracy of model M1 for ξ = 0.1 and ξ = 0.5 in Fig. 2.…”
Section: Approximating the Conditional Pgfl Of φ Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], the 1D Matèrn type-II process is enhanced with discrete marks modeling non-saturated data traffic, and the transmission success probability is evaluated. In [21], it is shown that with low transmission probability, the outage due to 1D Bernoulli lattice converges to that due to a PPP of equal intensity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generalization to more than three lanes is straightforward. The model should be particularly useful in cases with high transmission probability because, with strong thinning, the hardcore process converges to PPP [20]. Potential direction for future work is the application of more realistic propagation functions and fading channels for vehicle-tovehicle communication.…”
Section: Probability Of Outage − Synthetic Tracesmentioning
confidence: 99%