2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Galerkin methods for the steady-state Navier–Stokes equations

Abstract: We study the steady-state Navier-Stokes equations in the context of stochastic finite element discretizations. Specifically, we assume that the viscosity is a random field given in the form of a generalized polynomial chaos expansion. For the resulting stochastic problem, we formulate the model and linearization schemes using Picard and Newton iterations in the framework of the stochastic Galerkin method, and we explore properties of the resulting stochastic solutions. We also propose a preconditioner for solv… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second example of a stochastic eigenvalue problem that we consider is used to estimate the inf-sup stability constant associated with a discrete stochastic Stokes problem. Consider the following stochastic incompressible Stokes equation in a two-dimensional domain Such problems and more general stochastic Navier-Stokes equations have been studied in [29,35]. As in the diffusion problem, we assume that the stochastic viscosity a(x, ω) is represented by a truncated KL expansion (4.2) with random variables {ξ l } m l=1 .…”
Section: Stochastic Stokes Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second example of a stochastic eigenvalue problem that we consider is used to estimate the inf-sup stability constant associated with a discrete stochastic Stokes problem. Consider the following stochastic incompressible Stokes equation in a two-dimensional domain Such problems and more general stochastic Navier-Stokes equations have been studied in [29,35]. As in the diffusion problem, we assume that the stochastic viscosity a(x, ω) is represented by a truncated KL expansion (4.2) with random variables {ξ l } m l=1 .…”
Section: Stochastic Stokes Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to reduce the curse of dimensionality is to sparsify explicitly the set of polynomials, by bounding, for example, the total degree. [4][5][6][12][13][14] Alternatively, one can consider the full Cartesian space of polynomials with bounded individual degree, but never store the expansion coefficients explicitly. Instead, one approximates the tensor of coefficients by a low-rank decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During last decades there has been a rapid development in uncertainty quantification for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) with random inputs. These random inputs usually arise from lack of knowledge about the system or/and the measurements of realistic model parameters such as the permeability coefficients in diffusion problems [29,55], the viscosity parameters of incompressible flows [12,42,47,49], and shape parameters in acoustic scattering [58]. In particular, stochastic Helmholtz equations attracted a lot of interest recently and this paper aims at the development of efficient strategies for their solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to linear systems in Kronecker formulation [10,41,43]. We note that for stochastic Galerkin linear systems, various efficient iterative solvers such as mean-based preconditioning methods [41,43], hierarchical preconditioners [47,48], preconditioned low-rank projection methods [36] are vigorously studied. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, in the case of stochastic Helmholtz problems these methods have not been analysed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%