2005
DOI: 10.1186/bf03352554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic finite-fault modeling of ground motions from the June 27, 1998 Adana-Ceyhan earthquake

Abstract: In this study, acceleration time histories of the June 27, 1998 Adana-Ceyhan (Turkey) earthquake, are simulated using a stochastic modeling technique for finite faults proposed by Beresnev and Atkinson (1997). The fault length, width and the depth to the top of the fault for the earthquake are assumed 30 km, 21 km and 15 km, respectively, based on the aftershock distribution. Simulations are made for two common site classes: soil and rock. Their response characteristics are obtained from the site-specific ampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally the ground motion at a receiver from the entire fault is obtained by summing up the contribution from each subfault with a proper time delay. Stochastic finite-fault method has been verified by numerous studies to estimate reliable ground motions of (actual or scenario) earthquakes in various tectonic settings (e.g., Beresnev and Atkinson, 1998b;Atkinson and Beresnev, 2002;Benetatos and Kiratzi, 2004;Roumelioti et al, 2004;Yalcinkaya, 2005;Motazedian and Moinfar, 2006;Shoja-Taheri and Ghofrani, 2007;Castro et al, 2008;Ansal et al, 2009). One limitation of the traditional finite-fault model is the constraint on the number of subfaults and the dependence of the total radiated energy on the subfault size.…”
Section: Method: Stochastic Finite-fault Model Based On a Dynamic Cormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally the ground motion at a receiver from the entire fault is obtained by summing up the contribution from each subfault with a proper time delay. Stochastic finite-fault method has been verified by numerous studies to estimate reliable ground motions of (actual or scenario) earthquakes in various tectonic settings (e.g., Beresnev and Atkinson, 1998b;Atkinson and Beresnev, 2002;Benetatos and Kiratzi, 2004;Roumelioti et al, 2004;Yalcinkaya, 2005;Motazedian and Moinfar, 2006;Shoja-Taheri and Ghofrani, 2007;Castro et al, 2008;Ansal et al, 2009). One limitation of the traditional finite-fault model is the constraint on the number of subfaults and the dependence of the total radiated energy on the subfault size.…”
Section: Method: Stochastic Finite-fault Model Based On a Dynamic Cormentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The low frequencies, which are solved mostly by deterministic methods, need precise source and velocity models (e.g., [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]). On the other hand, incoherency of the phase angles can be modeled using stochastic approaches (e.g., [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]). In order to model the broadband frequency range, hybrid ground motion simulation techniques are introduced (e.g., [29][30][31][32][33]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%