2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic finite element method for non-linear material models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most recent advancements includes the truncation preconditioners [21,32,33], which we also use in our numerical experiments. We note that a similar study to ours was recently presented by [34], but here we focus on a more complex nonlinear model that includes a crack development, and we also study efficient solution of the linear systems obtained by use of the stochastic Galerkin method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most recent advancements includes the truncation preconditioners [21,32,33], which we also use in our numerical experiments. We note that a similar study to ours was recently presented by [34], but here we focus on a more complex nonlinear model that includes a crack development, and we also study efficient solution of the linear systems obtained by use of the stochastic Galerkin method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Expansion (34) is then used to calculate expansion (18). In general, while by [12] when considering the expansion of the displacement (25) using gPC polynomials of degree p it would be possible to use gPC polynomials of degree up to 2p in expansion (34), in the numerical experiments we used expansions of the same degree and we set n K = n ξ .…”
Section: Example 1: Simply Supported Reinforced Concrete Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in systems in which the materials used have nonlinear behavior, it is possible to achieve the solution by incremental methods, which itself requires a lot of computational costs. Therefore, in these cases, finding methods that reduce the computational volume will be inevitable [13], [17]. Researchers have always sought appropriate solutions to this problem, one of which is the SSFEM first proposed by Ghanem and Spanos [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have used the aforementioned strategy to investigate the following topics: wave propagation analysis Vibration analysis of fiber-reinforced composites [19], composite plates [11], [20], random creep failure prediction [21], earth dams [22], shells [10], [11], wooden structures [23], elastodynamic issues in the time domain [24], and a variety of other instances have all been investigated. Lacour et al looked into the nonlinear behavior of uncertain materials without taking into account the loading system's uncertainty, and their findings are provided [17]. However, certain loading was assumed in a wide range from studies presented for the SSFEM, Yazdani et al can be mentioned among the limited researches in which loading is also assumed to be uncertain [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, Mccarthy and Gray [7] proposed and analyzed a deterministic model for predicting the distribution of loads in multibolt composite joints [8]. In other investigation, Lacour et al [9] have modeled the von Mises stress, stiffness, and displacements by a nonlinear stochastic model at each degree of freedom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%