2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0028972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic effects on the dynamics of an epidemic due to population subdivision

Abstract: Using a stochastic susceptible–infected–removed meta-population model of disease transmission, we present analytical calculations and numerical simulations dissecting the interplay between stochasticity and the division of a population into mutually independent sub-populations. We show that subdivision activates two stochastic effects—extinction and desynchronization—diminishing the overall impact of the outbreak even when the total population has already left the stochastic regime and the basic reproduction n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 c). This is the result of a cooperative effect between the local measures in different regions: Because of the targeted way in which local measures are applied, they have the chance of rendering individual regions disease-free by the end of the local lockdown or shortly afterwards through extinction [20] , initiating periods of quiescence without the need for restrictions. This happens at a faster rate than infections can be reintroduced through cross infections for sufficiently low ξ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 c). This is the result of a cooperative effect between the local measures in different regions: Because of the targeted way in which local measures are applied, they have the chance of rendering individual regions disease-free by the end of the local lockdown or shortly afterwards through extinction [20] , initiating periods of quiescence without the need for restrictions. This happens at a faster rate than infections can be reintroduced through cross infections for sufficiently low ξ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 d), using restrictions that are triggered and implemented locally can lead to a large reduction in the required restrictions. Note that these benefits are based explicitly on discrete, low numbers of infected individuals, similar to effects such as extinction [20] and persistence [ 18 , 19 ] observed for the ‘free’ evolution of the epidemic. They would therefore not be present in a deterministic mean-field description [6] (see Supplementary Information) as commonly used to track the dynamics of the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If local eradication is successful, these countries can profit from the absorbing state of zero SARS-CoV-2 infections, i.e. after local eradication new infection chains are only started if a virus is de novo carried into the country 65;66 . However, the local eradication is constantly put at risk by undetected influx of new viruses from abroad, requiring very strict quarantine for international travel, and – once the spread got out of control – decisive action to completely stop all infection chains.…”
Section: Supplementary Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemiological modelling of the COVID-19 outbreak has been used for forecasting the healthcare demand 2 and to develop containment strategies using non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI). 3,4,5 Modelling is also used to determine key parameters such as population immunity and infection fatality rate (IFR), and to analyse the impact of imposing and revoking social-distancing measures. 6,7,8,9,10 A well-established class of models is the Susceptible(S)-Exposed(E)-Infected(I)-Recovered(R)-Deceased(D) compartmental model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%