2011
DOI: 10.1615/intjmultcompeng.v9.i4.60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Design and Control in Random Heterogeneous Materials

Abstract: The present paper discusses a sampling framework that enables the optimization of complex systems characterized by high-dimensional uncertainties and design variables. We are especially concerned with problems relating to random heterogeneous materials where uncertainties arise from the stochastic variability of their properties. In particular, we reformulate topology optimization problems to account for the design of truly random composites. In addition, we address the optimal perscription of input loads/exci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its predictive uncertainty is incorporated and the selfsupervised active learning mechanism can control the number of training data that each particular surrogate would need. While not discussed, it is also possible to assess the optimization error, albeit with additional runs of the high-fidelity model, by using an Importance Sampling step [45]. Lastly we mention further potential of improvement by a fully Bayesian treatment of the surrogate's parameters θ, which would be particularly beneficial in the small-data regime we are operating in.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its predictive uncertainty is incorporated and the selfsupervised active learning mechanism can control the number of training data that each particular surrogate would need. While not discussed, it is also possible to assess the optimization error, albeit with additional runs of the high-fidelity model, by using an Importance Sampling step [45]. Lastly we mention further potential of improvement by a fully Bayesian treatment of the surrogate's parameters θ, which would be particularly beneficial in the small-data regime we are operating in.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is employed so that the resulting SDF integrates to 1 which is the variance of the corresponding Gaussian field. We made use of a spectral representation of the underlying Gaussian field (and therefore of xg) on the basis of its ϕ-controlled SDF and according to the formulations detailed in [47,48,45]. The thresholded Gaussian vector xg gives rise to the binary microstructure x as described above and we denote summarily the corresponding transformation as:…”
Section: Process-structure Linkagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration problem under uncertainty can then be formulated in two steps [18,19]. First, we naively compose a Bayesian calibration problem in analogy to (1), with the only difference that the model is also dependent on θ. Consequently, the posterior p x|θ, Y obs,C is conditionally dependent on θ, as demonstrated in (3a).…”
Section: Bayesian Calibration Under Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, too few intermediate distributions can adversely affect the overall accuracy of the particulate approximation. To that end we propose an adaptive SMC scheme used in UQ, stochastic design and system identification applications [34][35][36], which determines automatically the number of necessary intermediate distributions based on the effective sample size. The effective sample size is defined as…”
Section: Adaptive Sequential Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%