2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-03863-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic assessment of slope failure run-out triggered by earthquake ground motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A roller boundary condition is set at the left boundary of the domain to allow vertical material points' movements. Similar model slope was previously analyzed with the deterministic MPM(Bandara and Soga 2015;Wang 2017) as well as the SPH method(Nonoyama et al 2015;Zhang et al 2020;Huang et al 2020);…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A roller boundary condition is set at the left boundary of the domain to allow vertical material points' movements. Similar model slope was previously analyzed with the deterministic MPM(Bandara and Soga 2015;Wang 2017) as well as the SPH method(Nonoyama et al 2015;Zhang et al 2020;Huang et al 2020);…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The transmission process is based on the spatial relationship between material point and RF mesh element (e.g. a position-to-position mapping process), which is similar to the methodology used in the random FEM (Gironacci et al 2018;Mousavi Nezhad et al 2018;Huang et al 2020). Therefore, the sample values of each element in the RF mesh are assigned to the material points surrounded by that element.…”
Section: Random Field Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7b shows the time-runout distance curves of landslides by MCS through 1000 samples, which presents the calculated runout distance of landslides at different times from all samples. Unlike the deterministic analysis, the heterogeneous cases show dramatic uncertainties of runout motions during the sliding time, in which the maximum runout distance is 12.23 m and the minimum runout distance is 9.40 m. As for larger runout distance, this is mainly because in some cases the failure paths in the spatially varying soil generally go through relatively weak soil zones (Liu et al 2019;Huang et al 2020), which may lead to an extensive runout distance. While other cases may face strong soil sections through their failure paths and consequently have relatively smaller runout distances.…”
Section: Comparative Analyses and Stochastic Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the samples are mapped onto the material points in the GIMP, in which each particle has a unique value of soil properties ( c and ). The transmission process is based on the spatial relationship between the material point and the RF mesh element (e.g., a position-toposition mapping process), which is similar to the methodology used in the random FEM (Gironacci et al 2018;Nezhad et al 2018aNezhad et al , 2018bHuang et al 2020). Therefore, the sample values of each element in the RF mesh are assigned to the corresponding material…”
Section: Implementation and Workflowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…difference in altitude, slope angle, and landslide volume, etc.) [36], while flow parameters or mechanical parameters of motion are not involved. Hence, it is a practical predictive means and many researchers have adopted this approach [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%