Stochastic and Chaotic Analysis of Students’ Attention Parameters of Different Ecological Zones

Abstract

A person's living in different environmental conditions also determines his special mental properties, such as memory, thinking, and attention. The aim of this work is to study the quality of students' attention aged 12-17 years living in different climatic and geographical regions: the city of Surgut of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Area and in the rural areas of central Russia (Samara region). Pupils of the first group live in extreme climatic conditions of the North, which are made worse by adverse social and environmental factors of urbanization. Pupils of the second group live in a climatically and environmentally friendly area with minimal impact of man-made pollution. The method of the Bourdon correction test was used in a modification proposed by P. A. Rudik. Result. A comparative statistical analysis of the results obtained in the evaluation of the attention properties of different age groups of students was carried out. The dynamics of changes in the K, E, A indices were studied, and the coefficients as a whole were calculated for the entire test and for each minute of the experiment. Specific features of the student's attention development were defined. Age and gender differences, differences in the development of attention indicators in students from two different schools were revealed. Conclusions: statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) of attention distribution and productivity were revealed: the attention efficiency coefficient of Surgut students is 1.15 times lower than that of their peers from the Samara region. All this demonstrates the differences in the attention parameters of students in different ecological zones.

Models of uncertainty in the framework of compartment-cluster theory for research of instability biosystems

“…Any sample of the parameter xi(t) for TMG, TPG, EMG, CI, ENG, EEG (etc.) will be unique, it cannot be arbitrarily repeated two times (or more) [4][5][6][7][8][9][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”

“…She uses different concepts and models, which is consistent with's theorem K. Gödel. However, this third science (the theory of chaos-self-organization -TCS) does not completely deny the DSS [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”

“…For example, we present a typical matrix of paired comparisons of samples of tremorograms (TMG), of many thousands of other matrices (similar) for tapping gram (TPG), cardiointervals (CI), electromyograms (EMG), electroneurograms (ENG), electroencephalograms (EEG) and other parameters xi(t) functions of the human body [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”

What do Zadeh’s Fuzziness and Weaver’s Complexity Have in Common in Cybernetics?

“…Во всех этих «нечетких» науках прошлое определяет будущее, пусть и не точно, в рамках стохастики, но всегда как бы должны быть повторения процессов и некоторый прогноз будущего состояния системы. Это основа кибернетики и биокибернетики, и это является огромной ошибкой или заблуждением [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75].…”

New Understanding of Steady States in Biological Systems

“…Оказалось, что именно такими свойствами обладают все параметры организма человека [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Это получило название эффекта Еськова-Зинченко (ЭЕЗ) в виде уникальности выборок параметров x i (t) организма человека (при повторных регистрациях у одного и того же испытуемого или при регистрации параметров отдельной группы испытуемых (тоже при повторениях)).…”