52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2013.6761034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic analysis of genetic promoter architectures with memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental studies have directly probed fluctuations of protein levels across cells [4,5]. Theoretical models assuming specific promoter configurations have solved for the co-efficient of variance CV 2 of the mRNA and protein numbers, as well as their full steady state distributions [6][7][8][9][10]. Stochastic gene expression has been shown to be a fundamental property of living cells, affecting critical physiological processes of biological and biomedical importance [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies have directly probed fluctuations of protein levels across cells [4,5]. Theoretical models assuming specific promoter configurations have solved for the co-efficient of variance CV 2 of the mRNA and protein numbers, as well as their full steady state distributions [6][7][8][9][10]. Stochastic gene expression has been shown to be a fundamental property of living cells, affecting critical physiological processes of biological and biomedical importance [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another experimental study of transcriptional bursting across the mammalian genome it was observed that the time spent in the inactive promoter state can be very long 35 . In these cases, the inactive state is better described by a refractory period in the “OFF” state modeled by two sequential processes, before the gene can be switched on again 36 . Including multiple inactive states via a three-state promoter system could provide a means to model a highly repressed stage characterized by hypermethylated CpG islands, which are considered distinct from the more reversible form of silencing mediated by the recruitment of histone deacetylases 16 ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%