1992
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(92)90495-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STM imaging of molecules: factors affecting their reliable imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of factors which influence how well the STM can image a particular molecule on a given surface have been discussed in detail in several recent publications. A key factor is the contribution of the adsorbate electronic structure to the STM image. If the STM image is dominated by the adsorbate electronic states, the molecular image can be more readily interpreted than if the STM image is dominated by the electronic structure of the substrate with a small modification induced by the adsorbed species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of factors which influence how well the STM can image a particular molecule on a given surface have been discussed in detail in several recent publications. A key factor is the contribution of the adsorbate electronic structure to the STM image. If the STM image is dominated by the adsorbate electronic states, the molecular image can be more readily interpreted than if the STM image is dominated by the electronic structure of the substrate with a small modification induced by the adsorbed species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, STM imaging of adsorbed molecules has been successful when the adsorbate contribution to the wave function is >10%, while imaging of the internal structure of adsorbed molecules has been most successful for strongly chemisorbed molecules for which the adsorbate contribution to the wave function is ∼30−50% . Characteristics of the substrate, such as flatness and cleanliness, can also affect how easily adsorbed molecular structures can be distinguished from substrate structures …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, individual molecules have been imaged. This has been much more difficult, because often the molecules do not form stable interactions with the surface and can be displaced or damaged by the tip during scanning (Nawaz et al, 1992). In spite of this, since the pioneering observations of isolated viruses (Baro et al, 1985) many images of isolated molecules have been published, especially of nucleic acids (Arscott and Bloomfield, 1990;Thundat et al, 1992aThundat et al, , 1992b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of SPM imaging of biomolecules, most of the effort to date has been to optimize the scan parameters in order to reduce the damage done to the molecule (Engel, 1991;Nawaz et al, 1992). However, the central problem which has arisen is the reproducibility of the sample preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggregates of several molecules are visible aligned along graphite steps or cut by the scanning probe, as indiated by the horizontal white stripes. Most of scanning probe microscopy studies of isolated biomolecules report such difficulties in imagig because of motion of the molecules on the surface caused by the interaction of the scanning tp with the samWle (Nawaz et al, 1992).…”
Section: Modificatio Of Hopg Surface By Glow Dishargementioning
confidence: 99%