2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stir bar sorptive extraction with in situ derivatization and thermal desorption-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for measurement of phenolic xenoestrogens in human urine samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
33
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors developed a method that was fairly sensitive [limit of detection (LOD) = 0.12 ng/mL]; concentrations of unconjugated BPA were < LOD, and concentrations of BPA glucuronide ranged from 0.11 to 0.51 ng/mL. After this initial examination in pooled urine, more than a dozen additional small studies examined urinary BPA concentrations and/or its metabolites in < 100 adults each (Arakawa et al 2004;Carwile et al 2009;García-Prieto et al 2008;Joskow et al 2006;Kawaguichi et al 2005;Kim et al 2003;Liu et al 2005;Mao et al 2004;Matsumoto et al 2003;Moors et al 2007;Nepomnaschy et al 2009;Ouichi and Watanabe 2002;Schöringhumer and Cichna-Markl 2007;Tsukioka et al 2003;Volkel et al 2005;Yang et al 2003;Ye et al 2005aYe et al , 2005b (Table 1). Although these studies used slightly different methods and different population samples, they overwhelmingly detected BPA or its conjugates in urine.…”
Section: Exposure Assessment From Urinary Measures Of Bpamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors developed a method that was fairly sensitive [limit of detection (LOD) = 0.12 ng/mL]; concentrations of unconjugated BPA were < LOD, and concentrations of BPA glucuronide ranged from 0.11 to 0.51 ng/mL. After this initial examination in pooled urine, more than a dozen additional small studies examined urinary BPA concentrations and/or its metabolites in < 100 adults each (Arakawa et al 2004;Carwile et al 2009;García-Prieto et al 2008;Joskow et al 2006;Kawaguichi et al 2005;Kim et al 2003;Liu et al 2005;Mao et al 2004;Matsumoto et al 2003;Moors et al 2007;Nepomnaschy et al 2009;Ouichi and Watanabe 2002;Schöringhumer and Cichna-Markl 2007;Tsukioka et al 2003;Volkel et al 2005;Yang et al 2003;Ye et al 2005aYe et al , 2005b (Table 1). Although these studies used slightly different methods and different population samples, they overwhelmingly detected BPA or its conjugates in urine.…”
Section: Exposure Assessment From Urinary Measures Of Bpamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even when using these specific methods, structure confirmation is required. Therefore, methods to quantify BPA or BPA-gluc by HPLC-UV, HPLC-FLD, or HPLC with electrochemical detection or after fluorophore derivatization in urine of nonintentionally exposed humans may have only limited applicability (Ouchi and Watanabe, 2002;Takeuchi and Tsutsumi, 2002;Matsumoto et al, 2003;Mao et al, 2004;Kawaguchi et al, 2005), since the use of internal standards with these methods is difficult and many possibly interfering compounds with fluorophores or electrochemical potential are present in biological samples. Quantitation of parent BPA with GC-MS has a sufficient sensitivity and a higher power of separation as compared with HPLC (Schönfelder et al, 2002), but the procedure requires solvent extraction and/or further sample preparation as a possible source of contamination with BPA and needs to be well evaluated to avoid production of false-positive results.…”
Section: Quantitation Of Bisphenol a In Biological Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…59 Recently, a highly sensitive analytical method using SBSE with in situ derivatization and thermal desorption GC-MS was developed for the simultaneous measurement of trace amounts of phenolic xenoestrogens in human urine samples. 60 Furthermore, SBSE in combination with HPLC-UV could be used for therapeutic drug monitoring of carbamazepine, phenytoin and phenobarbital in plasma samples. 61 Although the sensitivity of the SPME method can be improved by increasing the volume of the extraction phase, increased thickness of only the extraction phase would require a much longer equilibration time because the extraction rate is controlled by the thickness of the coating.…”
Section: ·2 Other Batch Equilibrium Microextraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%