2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00460-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus Timing-Dependent Plasticity in Cortical Processing of Orientation

Abstract: The relative timing of presynaptic and postsynaptic spikes plays a critical role in activity-induced synaptic modification. Here we examined whether plasticity of orientation selectivity in the visual cortex depends on stimulus timing. Repetitive pairing of visual stimuli at two orientations induced a shift in orientation tuning of cat cortical neurons, with the direction of the shift depending on the temporal order of the pair. Induction of a significant shift required that the interval between the pair fall … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
232
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
26
232
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). This finding is robust and has been found in neurons from the hippocampus using acute, (23) organotypic slices, (31) or dissociated cell culture, (32) and in layers V (33,34) and II/III (35) of the cerebral cortex, as well as in vivo preparations using cat (36,37) and Xenopus (38) visual systems. The temporal window permissive for LTP induction is 10-20 ms (milliseconds) whereas the window in which the presynaptic spike can follow the postsynaptic spike in order to induce LTD ranges from 20 to 100 ms in different preparations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…2). This finding is robust and has been found in neurons from the hippocampus using acute, (23) organotypic slices, (31) or dissociated cell culture, (32) and in layers V (33,34) and II/III (35) of the cerebral cortex, as well as in vivo preparations using cat (36,37) and Xenopus (38) visual systems. The temporal window permissive for LTP induction is 10-20 ms (milliseconds) whereas the window in which the presynaptic spike can follow the postsynaptic spike in order to induce LTD ranges from 20 to 100 ms in different preparations.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Intuitively, one might think that the observed shift of the tuning-curve peaks away from the adapted orientation in anesthetized animals (Dragoi et al 2000;Müller et al 1999) could explain the tilt aftereffect. However, it has been pointed out previously that precisely the opposite is likely to be true (Gilbert and Wiesel 1990;Yao and Dan 2001). The key point is that it is the peak location (or weighted average orientation) of the population response, instead of the tuning curve, that determines the perceived orientation.…”
Section: Psychophysical Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent experiments demonstrating that input timing on the order of milliseconds can be the difference between synaptic strengthening and weakening provides a potential mechanism that would allow sensory statistics to precisely control the connectivity and temporal dynamics of large networks of neurons (Bi and Poo, 1999;Feldman, 2000;Froemke and Dan, 2002;Schuett et al, 2001;Song and Abbott, 2001;Song et al, 2000;Yao and Dan, 2001;Zhang et al, 1998). Network models that incorporate this form of Hebbian learning, called spike-timing dependent synaptic plasticity (STDP), are highly sensitive to changes in input correlation (Song and Abbott, 2001).…”
Section: Potential Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%