2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus presentation can enhance spiking irregularity across subcortical and cortical regions

Abstract: Stimulus presentation is believed to quench neural response variability as measured by fano-factor (FF). However, the relative contributions of within-trial spike irregularity and trial-to-trial rate variability to FF fluctuations have remained elusive. Here, we introduce a principled approach for accurate estimation of spiking irregularity and rate variability in time for doubly stochastic point processes. Consistent with previous evidence, analysis showed stimulus-induced reduction in rate variability across… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firing rate was significantly higher in larger display sizes (F 3,4752 = 5.49, p = 0.001), showing that neurons fired more when there were more objects on the screen despite the decreasing value signal (Fig 4A-B vs. Fig 3C-D). Firing rate variability can be parsed into two components one related to trial-to-trial firing rate variability (nRV) and the other related to within-trial spiking irregularity (nSI, (Fayaz, Fakharian, & Ghazizadeh, 2022)). Consistent with previous findings, nRV was reduced after display onset (Churchland et al, 2011; Fayaz et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firing rate was significantly higher in larger display sizes (F 3,4752 = 5.49, p = 0.001), showing that neurons fired more when there were more objects on the screen despite the decreasing value signal (Fig 4A-B vs. Fig 3C-D). Firing rate variability can be parsed into two components one related to trial-to-trial firing rate variability (nRV) and the other related to within-trial spiking irregularity (nSI, (Fayaz, Fakharian, & Ghazizadeh, 2022)). Consistent with previous findings, nRV was reduced after display onset (Churchland et al, 2011; Fayaz et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cortical neural networks, an optimal system state in the present context must be selected from a large probability distribution. Neuroscientists have previously modeled this inherently probabilistic computation with Bayesian statistics [50], random-connection models [51], or fanofactor analysis of spike variance over time [54]. This report shows that non-deterministic signaling outcomes can be achieved through a mechanistic (not a statistically random) process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model of neural computation both vindicates and elaborates Friston's free energy principle [21][22][23][24], providing a thermodynamic basis for the reduction of 'surprise' during predictive processing. While prior efforts used statistical methods to model the inherently probabilistic patterns of cortical neural network activity [1][2][3]18], the present model usefully shows how energy-efficient nondeterministic computation might be achieved by following thermodynamic laws.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compute the most likely state of the surrounding environment, a cortical neural network must select an optimal system state in the present context from a large probability distribution. Researchers have previously modeled this inherently probabilistic computation with Bayesian statistics [1], random-connection models [2], or fanofactor analysis of spike variance over time [3]. For individual neurons, the Hodgkin-Huxley equations provide a good approximation of firing patterns under steadystate conditions [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%