2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus-induced gamma power predicts the amplitude of the subsequent visual evoked response

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ASD, TMS can change some of the core deficits, more specifically, those impairments in self-monitoring that constitute our supervisory attentional system [ 10 , 29 , 40 , 41 , 68 ]. Higher amplitude of early evoked gamma activity has been correlated to faster behavioral responses, which could constitute impulsive behaviors [ 69 ]. Indeed, results from previous trials suggest that individuals with ASD have a reduced sensitivity for monitoring errors (i.e., a diminished response time after committing an error) and instituting corrective actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ASD, TMS can change some of the core deficits, more specifically, those impairments in self-monitoring that constitute our supervisory attentional system [ 10 , 29 , 40 , 41 , 68 ]. Higher amplitude of early evoked gamma activity has been correlated to faster behavioral responses, which could constitute impulsive behaviors [ 69 ]. Indeed, results from previous trials suggest that individuals with ASD have a reduced sensitivity for monitoring errors (i.e., a diminished response time after committing an error) and instituting corrective actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While, in principle, this is possible, the current pattern of results is unlikely to be related to enhanced gamma power. First, the power of sensory gamma oscillations was previously shown to be associated with faster response times for both visual and tactile stimuli (Krebber et al, 2015; van Es and Schoffelen, 2019). Thus, enhanced sensory gamma power should speed, not delay, responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing evidence (Bahramisharif et al, 2013;Jensen et al, 2014;Roux et al, 2013;Spaak et al, 2012) and current theories on the functional role of the alpha band (Bonnefond et al, 2017;Jensen and Mazaheri, 2010) suggest that the pulsed inhibition caused by alpha oscillations, which shortens the duty cycle, occurs by means of cross-frequency interactions with the gamma band. Importantly, although gamma activity is often associated with stimulus processing (Fries et al, 2007; but see Ray and Maunsell, 2015), alpha-gamma interactions have been consistently recorded during rest and prestimulus windows (Bahramisharif et al, 2013;Osipova et al, 2008;Spaak et al, 2012; but see Ray and Maunsell 2015), suggesting their crucial role in shaping the perceptual outcome (Ni et al, 2016a;van Es and Schoffelen, 2019). Figure 3, the relationship between alpha and gamma oscillations is regulated both by amplitudeamplitude coupling (AAC), i.e., alpha power increase associated with gamma decrease, and by phaseamplitude coupling (PAC) interactions, i.e., gamma power nested within the alpha phase (Spaak et al, 2012).…”
Section: Alpha Inhibition Through Alpha-gamma Cross-frequency Interacmentioning
confidence: 99%